Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With help from producer Raymond Rapada. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Eli | Email Lauren PROGRAMMING NOTE: We’ll be off next week for the holidays but back to our normal schedule on Tuesday, Jan. 2. We hope absence makes the heart grow fonder. After the holidays, Senate negotiators and the White House will return to the table to take another stab at a border deal. The talks, so far, have proved to be incredibly complicated. And as they drag on, the chorus of critics is growing louder. Experts across the immigration space are not only complaining about the nature of the policies under consideration, but warning they won’t actually do anything to bring down migration numbers. West Wing Playbook called one of those experts: JASON HOUSER, former chief of staff for Immigration and Customs Enforcement under President JOE BIDEN. This conversation has been edited for length. The border issue has really been a stressor for this administration since the beginning. I must admit in those early days, we were scared at 4,200-a-day at the border. When I hear numbers today, how they’re at 11,000-a-day, you’re talking about a situation where law enforcement, ICE, CBP, they’re trying to deal with a problem that they’ve already lost. So, a big gripe with the policies on the table is that they’re not going to actually address the border problem? The immigration continuum doesn’t start at the border. It starts when a migrant makes the decision that they could die or their family could die, and they make that trek north. Just fixating on these policies that Sen. [James] Lankford and others want are not going to lead to any less encounters. Let’s just say we’re still at 10,000 today at the border, and it’s a mix of Cubans, Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Hondurans, and you create another Title 42 expulsion program. OK, we just had that for two years. Did numbers go down? No. And in actuality, in some of those nationality subsets, it created recidivists. You’ve said these policies could create “Hurricane Katrina level catastrophe” across border sectors. What does that mean? Look at some of what Republicans are pushing: mandatory detention by CBP and ICE. So, your time in custody is gonna go up and the number of migrants in those detention centers and in hold areas of CBP is gonna go up. Traffickers will see that. They’ll then flow more migrants into those areas, overwhelming them. Then CBP will have to either call assistance from other law enforcement or they’ll have to cut people loose. You’re going to have hundreds of thousands of people in custody. Do we have enough medical care? Do we have enough people to do Covid testing? Do we have enough clothing, food, water, sanitation? No. What about Republicans’ warnings about an overwhelmed border, and the national security risk this poses? Just operationally, if you say to ICE, “you mandatorily must oversee just this expedited removal process,” then they are not going to be focused on the public safety and national security threats — the rapists, the murders, the gang leaders. Have current border officials you stay in touch with expressed concern about this? I have a lot of former friends, they’re very concerned. But they also understand the complexities of the negotiations. At the same time, if this is the moment politically, the president can’t now just give the Republicans what they want without also going on the offense and gaining what could really solve the problem, like more pathways, more resourcing for non-detained custody. Are you surprised the White House has gone as far as it has? The challenge that I always saw is that it’s either looking at it as a border and not an immigration problem or just trying to solve the problem of the day. It immediately jettisons up into the White House to the political space. It goes directly from strategic politics in the White House to operations within DHS. There’s no tactical-level planning or design to implement that grander strategy. MESSAGE US — Are you WILLIAM MCINTEE, senior adviser for public engagement? We want to hear from you. And we’ll keep you anonymous! Email us at westwingtips@politico.com. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here!
|