SHORING UP: California’s deportation-resistance agenda is starting to take shape in anticipation of Donald Trump’s presidency, as lawmakers propose legal-aid funding and new laws to shield undocumented residents from sweeping federal immigration enforcement. The Legislature threw up numerous legal and logistical obstacles to large-scale deportations during Trump’s first term. Now, as the president-elect again vows a sweeping crackdown, Democratic lawmakers are floating new ideas to prevent family separation and labor-force disruptions — consequences that Gov. Gavin Newsom warned about today in a news conference at the border. “When you look at farm workers … roughly half are undocumented,” he said. “Close to 90 percent have been in the state for years and years and years. They're not going back and forth. Close to 60 percent have kids. The impacts of mass deportation on the cost of food in this state, in this nation, are off the charts.” Here’s a rundown of California’s existing laws — and its latest proposals. Isn’t California already a sanctuary state? In 2017, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed a raft of legislation designed to prevent deportations by limiting undocumented Californians’ exposure to federal immigration authorities. The most substantial, and best-known, measure is SB 54, also known as California’s “sanctuary state” policy. It restricts local law enforcement from cooperating with immigration agents. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2020 declined to hear a challenge to the law, allowing it to remain in effect. Brown also signed legislation preventing employers from allowing immigration enforcement in private workplace areas without a warrant and prohibiting landlords from sharing or threatening to share tenants’ immigration status, among other bills. California has the biggest population of undocumented immigrants in the country, with 1.8 million as of 2022. What other protections are lawmakers hoping to pass for undocumented immigrants? As soon as the new legislative session kicked off on Monday, lawmakers began introducing immigration bills. Some policies have been attempted or in the works for some time, but they may take on more urgency now. Legislation from Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi would require Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to have a warrant and meet other requirements before entering school and child care facilities. The push, he told Playbook, is an effort to prevent ICE officers from following undocumented parents to and from schools to arrest them — something that memorably happened in Los Angeles in 2017. (Former Assemblymember Patrick O’Donnell introduced a proposal similar to Muratsuchi’s that year, but many provisions were removed). Assemblymember Mike Gipson wants to expand SB 54 so that it applies to some parolees in state prison custody, as the sanctuary-state law contains a carveout for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. But his bill will likely face significant hurdles. Newsom vetoed similar legislation in 2023, saying it would “impede CDCR's interaction with a federal law enforcement agency charged with assessing public safety risks.” The governor today cited the SB 54 prison exemption when discussing cooperation with federal immigration officials, further underscoring his reluctance to change it. How hefty are the legal aid proposals? The Senate and Assembly each have their own version of special session bills to shore up Department of Justice funding in anticipation of Trump administration-related lawsuits. Senate Budget Chair Scott Wiener’s legislation would allocate $60 million, including $25 million for “local front line legal and community-based organizations that protect the civil rights of vulnerable populations.” Two bills from Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel would provide $25 million for future litigation and another $500,000 for the state to prepare its legal defense. Both chambers and the governor will have to come to an agreement on these requests early next year. IT’S THURSDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@politico.com.
|