Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the preparations, personnel decisions and policy deliberations of Donald Trump’s transition. POLITICO Pro subscribers receive a version of this newsletter first. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Eli | Email Lauren | Email Lisa | Email Megan A West Coast federal appeals court on Tuesday revisited the issue of whether emergency rooms must provide abortions to patients in medical distress. But DONALD TRUMP’s administration may upend the case — and several other reproductive health battles — early next year. The full bench for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from JOE BIDEN’s Justice Department that Idaho’s enforcement of its near-total abortion ban during medical emergencies violates RONALD REAGAN-era patient protections — a case the Supreme Court weighed and punted to lower court judges earlier this year, saying it took up the issue prematurely. Trump’s inauguration will likely come before the 9th Circuit issues a ruling — and anti-abortion activists are confident his administration will either drop the challenge, settle with Idaho, or change its interpretation of federal emergency room regulations in a way that renders the lawsuit moot. This case will likely be just the first of many legal abortion wars of his administration as courts around the country grapple with a wave of litigation following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision upending Roe v. Wade. And while Trump campaigned on a promise to reject a federal abortion ban, his administration’s more under-the-radar litigation and rulemaking could roll back abortion access in all states, even those deemed friendly to abortion rights. “President-elect Trump said he wants to leave abortion as a state's issue,” said CAROLYN McDONNELL, the litigation counsel for the anti-abortion group Americans United for Life. “So it's unlikely that he'll just continue litigating the case — that's not really an option.” The Trump transition did not respond to questions about its plans for the lawsuit. The health care chapter of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 urges the incoming president to rescind the Biden administration’s 2022 guidance that hospitals must render stabilizing care in an emergency, including abortions when necessary, regardless of state bans. The document also calls on Trump to end all of the Biden administration’s investigations into hospitals that have turned pregnant patients away. But Trump’s return to the White House isn’t necessarily game over for this case — or any of the other abortion fights he will inherit on Jan. 20, which range from questions about abortion pill availability to funding for family planning clinics. If the DOJ bows out of cases Biden's legal team brought against states they believe are violating federal protections — or refuses to defend Biden’s pro-abortion rights policies from outside lawsuits — then doctors, patients or even Democratic state attorneys general are expected to try to intervene to try to keep the challenges alive. “There's a broad and diverse community of advocates and people who rely on and believe it's important that reproductive health care be as protected as possible, that are considering their legal options,” said SKYE PERRYMAN, the president of the progressive legal group Democracy Forward, which is representing doctors and abortion pill manufacturers in other ongoing cases. “Many in Idaho who have been harmed by the state violation of federal law would have legal recourse and remedies should the Department of Justice fail to itself continue to defend federal law.” And if courts deny those parties’ attempts to intervene, notes the ACLU’s ALEXA KOLBI-MOLINAS, any individual who believes their rights were violated could file new challenges. A patient “who is harmed could bring a lawsuit. A doctor who is retaliated against could bring a lawsuit. And a hospital who receives a patient dumped from another hospital has recourse too. So if this case goes away, that doesn’t stop individuals,” she said. In the meantime, a cloud of uncertainty is hanging over people like JESSICA EVANS-WALL, an emergency medicine doctor in Boise, Idaho, who told West Wing Playbook that fear and confusion about how federal patient protections and her state’s abortion ban interact has harmed not only pregnant patients, but everyone coming to her ER. “I’ve had to be on the phone with a lawyer at 2 a.m. on a Saturday over an ectopic pregnancy, which delayed care not just for that patient but for everyone coming in for a stroke, heart attack or other serious emergency,” she said. “Medically, it was so clear what we needed to do. But legally, it wasn’t.” MESSAGE US — Are you MARTIN MAKARY? We want to hear from you. And we’ll keep you anonymous! Email us at westwingtips@politico.com. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here! MEA CULPA: In yesterday’s edition, we inaccurately described the ambassador to Colombia’s responsibilities in relationship to Venezuela. Trump’s ambassador to Colombia may also be charged with handling the relationship with Venezuela if the administration doesn’t appoint a separate ambassador to Caracas.
|