BIG INSIDE CONGRESS NEWS: We're moving to the morning on Monday with a re-imagined and expanded newsletter. Before 5 a.m. Monday through Friday, we'll give you comprehensive reporting on Capitol Hill politics and policy, from leadership offices to committee rooms, caucus meetings and the K Street of it all. Stay tuned. INSIDE THE INTEL CHAIR DRAMA The House Freedom Caucus has been in a cold war with now-former Intelligence Chair Mike Turner. Speaker Mike Johnson ended it officially on Thursday — and it seems clear that hardliners won. Johnson claimed Thursday that no Freedom Caucus members demanded that he remove Turner (R-Ohio), but conservatives in the group have made it clear they aren’t his biggest fans. The feud broke out into the open after he made a cryptic post about a “serious national security” threat last year, which turned out to be intelligence related to a space-based nuclear weapon. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, called on Johnson to launch a formal inquiry into Turner’s statement and accused Turner of trying to use scare tactics to build support for sending more aid to Ukraine and renewing a controversial surveillance power. (Though HFC types weren’t the only ones angry with Turner over the episode.) Reminder: Conservatives have repeatedly railed against sending additional aid to Ukraine and wanted stricter limits on the intelligence community’s surveillance authority. Turner’s side won that fight during a months-long showdown last year. So it’s hard to see how that fight wasn’t somehow relevant to Turner’s ouster, given Johnson’s need to stay on the good side of his rebellious right flank. Intelligence is a select committee, meaning Johnson picks GOP members and leadership unilaterally — many House Republicans were shocked when the speaker tossed him. And hardliners seemed satisfied with his new pick, Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.). “I think Rick will do a great job,” Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) said, adding that he felt Crawford worked well across the conference. “Obviously this is a call for the speaker, I respect whoever he thinks will do a good job.” And Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) said it would be “a good, fresh start for a new session and a new administration.” Crawford voted against Ukraine aid last year, which would make him more popular with conservatives and is a significant shift from Turner, known for being one of the strongest supporters of Ukraine in the conference. And in a statement after the new committee membership was announced, Crawford hinted that he backed the Freedom Caucus’ stance on limiting surveillance by the intelligence community — though he didn’t make any commitments about scaling it back. Crawford backed the surveillance legislation that many Freedom Caucus members and privacy hawks opposed. “Since joining the Committee in 2017, I have witnessed firsthand that abuse within our nation’s security apparatus has eroded trust in our institutions and compromised America’s ability to gather intelligence,” Crawford said. “As Chairman, I will aggressively uphold our mandate to provide credible and robust oversight of the Intelligence Community’s funding and activities.” The Arkansas Republican is the most senior member of the committee and has kept a relatively low profile. And some of conservatives’ praise might not only be about Crawford himself, but also who Johnson didn’t pick for the lead spot. Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) was someone who was apparently eyeing the spot, which likely would’ve been a problem for some hardliners. He told Ogles to “fucking check himself” after he called for the Turner inquiry. Conservatives got a few other wins on the committee, too: Johnson added Reps. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) and Eli Crane (R-Ariz.) to the panel on Thursday. — Mia McCarthy, with assists from Meredith Lee Hill GOOD EVENING! Welcome to Inside Congress, the play-by-play guide to all things Capitol Hill, on this Thursday, Jan. 16, where we’re prepping for our first Senate Friday (let's see how long this lasts).
|