RENEWABLES TEST — POLITICO’s Marie J. French: Gov. Kathy Hochul faces a difficult balancing act as her administration weighs a request for increased subsidies from renewable developers who warn that they may otherwise have to scrap projects that are critical for New York's climate goals. The state’s Public Service Commission is expected to decide next week whether or not to grant an “inflation adjustment” for four offshore wind and 86 land-based renewable projects. Together, they comprise nearly 25 percent of the state’s projected electricity needs in 2030, when New York must meet a statutory 70 percent renewable electricity target. The total request, if approved as-is by the commission, would increase individual customer bills by about $4.60 each month. The developers are arguing the extra aid from ratepayers is vital for the projects and to retain public support for clean-energy initiatives by showing the economic benefits of the transition away from fossil fuels. “It's an economic challenge, but if we don't weather it and get these projects across the finish line into construction, it becomes a political challenge because then we can't demonstrate progress and we've lost that momentum,” said Anne Reynolds, the executive director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, which requested the adjustment on behalf of developers, Greening New York’s electricity mix, which today is heavily reliant on gas-powered turbines, is fundamental to meeting the emission reduction goals for the state and New York City. Adding more renewables makes electrifying transportation and buildings better for the environment and helps neighborhoods disproportionately burdened with polluting power plants. But growing costs for the projects has put many of them in peril in New York, as has happened in neighboring New Jersey and other parts of the country. And in New York, Hochul has yet to say whether she’ll back more public money for the projects, instead punting the problem of rising costs for renewable projects to President Joe Biden. She signed a letter with other governors in September pushing Biden to do more to support the offshore wind industry, and she touted a deal last week with the federal Department of Energy to help projects access low-cost financing. But in the short term, the state faces an urgent decision over whether to invest more into the projects or see if they can survive on their own. “It is a bumpy time for the renewables industry and one that the transition will become even more challenging,” said NYSERDA president and CEO Doreen Harris at the authority’s board meeting on Wednesday. “We are leaving no stone unturned.” — FULL COURT PRESS: In potential signs of escalating concern about what the PSC might decide (or not) on Thursday… Equinor and BP, the developers of the Empire Wind and Beacon Wind projects, filed comments Friday pushing back on those advocating for a re-bidding process for offshore wind, saying that such a step would not reduce costs, that changes to contracts don’t threaten future competitive procurements and that the relief requested won’t have as high of a cost as some have estimated. They pegged the cost of the three projects’ adjustment at $26 billion on a nominal basis. Plus, the commission shouldn’t try to take away some federal subsidies or otherwise impose new requirements in exchange for the adjustment. ACE NY similarly filed comments arguing there’s little evidence provided by opponents of the adjustment that projects would not be significantly delayed by a re-bidding process. “Taken as a whole, the record evidence demonstrates the extraordinary and unforeseeable Post-COVID Impacts must be redressed,” a lawyer for the group wrote. (The PSC didn’t set a schedule or ask for any reply comments, but that hasn’t dissuaded folks as the requested decision date looms.) NYLCV sent a member alert on Friday urging environmental advocates to contact Hochul and comment to the PSC. “If these projects are allowed to fail, we will fall years behind in meeting our climate targets and ratepayers will face ever higher bills and continued reliance on polluting power plants,” the group warned. Former New York City Council member Costa Constantinides backed action, targeting Hochul and the PSC in an op-ed placed in AMNY: A “decision to let the offshore wind industry be delayed or die in New York is sentencing another generation of Astoria residents to face the health challenges that we have faced for generations.” Citizens Campaign for the Environment is also holding an event to back the Empire Wind 2 transmission line and the inflation adjustment for the projects on Wednesday ahead of hearings. More public pressure ahead of the critical decision on Thursday is expected. — PLUS: Newsday’s Randi Marshall shares the ominous offshore wind industry vibes ahead of a key decision for the Public Service Commission. MORE WIND UNCERTAINTY — Ocean Wind 2, one of three offshore wind farms approved by New Jersey regulators, has an increasingly uncertain future. “It is our expectation to build a second New Jersey project, but at this time, we can’t be more specific on what or when that will be,” Stephanie Francoeur, a spokesperson for energy giant Orsted, told POLITICO. Ocean Wind 2 is one of two Orsted projects approved by state officials. Earlier this year, lawmakers and Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration rushed through a bill to save Ocean Wind 1 from financial uncertainty, though that project has also been delayed. The company’s comments about Ocean Wind 2 come months after Orsted talked about its plans of “reconfiguring” some projects, a term which encompasses a series of possible changes due to economic conditions but also technical considerations. Francoeur said the company is in early stage talks with the state that could result in adjustments to Ocean Wind 2. Bailey Lawrence, a spokesperson for the governor, said the Murphy administration “recognizes the supply chain and inflation challenges faced by the emerging offshore wind industry not just in our state, but across the Northeast.” Last week, Orsted put $200 million into escrow meant to help support a wind port the state is heavily invested in, but changes to Ocean Wind 2 could also effect the use of that port. The state has so far approved three projects, the two Orsted projects and another project known as Atlantic Shores, which is likewise facing escalating costs and has not received any special relief yet from the state. “Despite these challenges,” Lawrence said, “we are continuing to work tirelessly to maximize revenue opportunities at the Wind Port, both from in-state and out-of-state projects. Offshore wind development remains integral to New Jersey’s pursuit of a 100 percent clean energy economy and thousands of family-sustaining jobs, and we are confident that our state will continue to serve – and grow – as a national offshore wind hub.” — Ry Rivard HAPPY TUESDAY MORNING: Let us know if you have tips, story ideas or life advice. We're always here at mfrench@politico.com and rrivard@politico.com. And if you like this letter, please tell a friend and/or loved one to sign up. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories.
|