JUST INQUIRING — Not so long ago, the prospects of an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden appeared dim. The case seemed slipshod. Centrist Republicans, many of them sitting in House districts carried by Biden, pointed to a lack of evidence. Even some who weren’t in competitive seats worried about the direction of impeachment efforts. “Republicans in the House who are itching for an impeachment are relying on an imagined history,” wrote Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), a member of the Trump-aligned House Freedom Caucus. Yet with one working day left in Congress, every member of the GOP majority voted today to open a formal impeachment inquiry into the president — including Buck. What changed between then and now? Many of the battleground-district Republicans still do not think there is enough evidence to impeach the president. But in the past month, GOP leadership has managed to whip enough votes to at least initiate the impeachment process, relying on the message that today’s action was merely a vote for an inquiry. "As we have said numerous times before, voting in favor of an impeachment inquiry does not equal impeachment," Majority Whip Tom Emmer said during a press conference on Tuesday. That distinction is an important one, at least in political terms. As Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), who represents an Omaha-based district that voted for Biden by six points, put it recently, “I can defend an inquiry. I can’t defend impeachment right now.” The point about defensibility is an important one since there are 18 House Republicans representing districts that voted for Biden. That’s more than enough seats to flip control of the House next year. These members are caught in the crosswinds between Republican hardliners, who very much want to impeach the president, and the many Democrats back home, who view it as a crass partisan exercise. The members who once seemed so reluctant to go down the impeachment path now point to a contentious mid-November letter from the White House to the House GOP as justification. The letter asserted that “congressional harassment of the President to score political points is precisely the type of conduct that the Constitution and its separation of powers was meant to prevent” and questioned the House investigation’s legitimacy since they had not held a formal inquiry vote. Not long after, in early December, Speaker Mike Johnson announced there would be a vote on the inquiry. Republicans across the conference emphasize that today’s action is merely a vote to give the House full access to documents, interviews, and evidence needed to prove — or disprove — any impeachable offenses from the president. “If getting more information and exercising oversight responsibility requires us to continue this inquiry, I’m comfortable continuing the inquiry,” Rep Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.), who represents a district where Biden won 51 percent, told Nightly. Left unsaid by many Republicans is that an inquiry vote also temporarily alleviates pressure from conservative hardliners back home and, for the time being, deprives potential GOP primary challengers of ammunition. The House goes out of session tomorrow, so members will undoubtedly get an earful on the subject when they return home — particularly the 18 who will be traveling back to districts that Joe Biden won in 2020. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at mmccarthy@politico.com or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @Reporter_Mia.
|