The Supreme Court later today will hear arguments in a landmark case that could shape Congress’s ability to levy taxes on unrealized investment gains — including a hypothetical wealth tax. But that’s hardly the only tax case that’s threatening wallets on Wall Street. A recent ruling in a federal case involving Soroban Capital Management, a New York hedge fund led by Eric Mandelblatt, could spell doom for a tactic that top executives at investment firms use to avoid paying self-employment taxes. Here’s how: Outside investors in private funds — known as limited partners — are exempted by law from having to pay self-employment taxes that help fund Social Security and Medicare. LPs aren’t involved with the fund’s day-to-day operations and they typically don’t have much say in how the fund manager ultimately invests their capital. The fund managers pay self-employment taxes on their salaries. But they often claim that those executives are also LPs, and are therefore eligible for the same exemption when it comes to fund profits generated on top of their guaranteed income. In the Soroban ruling, Judge Ronald Buch of the U.S. Tax Court wrote that Congress’s phrasing made it clear that the LP exception does not apply to a partner “who is limited in name only.” That would open the door to self-employment taxes on hundreds of millions of dollars for certain fund managers. The IRS is already seeking self-employment taxes on a combined $486 million from Soroban and Steve Cohen’s Point72 Asset Management in separate cases, the WSJ’s Richard Rubin and Peter Rudegeair report. Self-employment taxes can be as high as 3.8 percent. It’s unknown how many other firms could face a similar bill, but “any trade or business operated as a limited partnership with ‘active’ limited partners are implicated,” Raj Tanden, a tax partner at Foley & Lardner, told MM. In an alert published last week, Tanden wrote that the safest course for some fund managers may be to pay taxes on whatever distributive share of income they generate from their partnership. The IRS’ push is raising the hackles of hedge fund lobbyists and Wall Streeters who view the agency’s legal strategy — and attempt to curtail use of the “limited partnership” exemption — as overreach. Three sources told MM that they expect Soroban to appeal. “Right now, there’s no definition of what qualifies as a limited partner,” said one source familiar with the cases who was granted anonymity to discuss litigation. “At the end of the day, the federal tax law doesn’t provide that definition. The IRS can’t change the law.” Representatives for Soroban did not respond to a request for comment. The IRS declined to comment. IT’S TUESDAY — It’s going to be a very busy couple of days in both D.C. and New York. Your host will be at the Goldman Sachs Financial Services Conference today and tomorrow — reach out if you want to gossip. And as always, send tips and suggestions to Sam at ssutton@politico.com and Zach at zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|