Copyright could shape the global AI map

How the next wave of technology is upending the global economy and its power structures
Jan 08, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO's Digital Future Daily newsletter logo

By Christine Mui

Programming note: Digital Future Daily will be on the ground at CES this week, providing coverage Tuesday through Friday. If you’re attending this year’s conference, drop DFD’s Derek Robertson a line at drobertson@politico.com.

The OpenAI logo is seen displayed on a cell phone with an image on a computer monitor generated by ChatGPT's Dall-E text-to-image model, Friday, Dec. 8, 2023, in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

The OpenAI logo is seen displayed on a cell phone with an image on a computer monitor generated by ChatGPT's Dall-E text-to-image model. | AP Photo/Michael Dwyer

The future of generative AI could well be shaped by its relationship to the data that its models are trained on. The top large language models inhale vast quantities of published material scraped from every nook of the internet, much of it subject to copyright, and the rights-holders aren’t all happy about it.

A series of court cases, as well as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s interest in the issue, have led many observers to cast 2024 as a make-or-break year for the industry’s future.

What will this mean for AI? Despite the focus on 2024, the reality is that the cases now in court could take years to shake out, and it’s unclear when — or whether — the U.S. government will take any kind of new position.

But there’s another way to think about the copyright battle: not as a survival threat to generative AI, as tech companies and venture capitalists have warned, but as a force that could re-map the industry globally.

Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton business school and AI researcher, predicts that copyright laws — which vary from country to country — could well bring on a geographic reshuffling of AI development that favors countries based on their varying IP regimes.

“People tend to view this AI copyright stuff in apocalyptic terms,” he told DFD. “The EU law is likely to be different from U.S. law. You can easily imagine companies headquartered, nominally or in reality, in another country doing training.”

So where will AI go? One potential benefactor is Japan, where current law generally permits AI models to train on copyrighted material without obtaining a license or permission.

If court rulings in America start to go against AI training, Mollick envisions a U.S. generative AI field consisting chiefly of industry giants with the means to handle legal challenges or obtain clear rights through licensing deals, while startups gravitate toward places like Japan.

Ryan Abbott, a partner at law firm Brown Neri Smith & Khan, agrees that scenario is certainly plausible, telling DFD that “there’s definitely going to be some level of geographic resorting. Whether it’s a major one or not remains to be seen, as does the geographic landscape for these rules.”

In the U.S., at least, legal disputes around how copyright law principles will apply to AI are spread across various forums. It’s conceivable that district and circuit courts will offer different interpretations, leaving an opening for the Supreme Court to weigh in. Obtaining a conclusive answer under U.S. law might take up to a decade, according to Abbott.

“That is an eternity in the technologies we're looking at and considering right now,” he added. “It may be that in the light of uncertainty, some companies decide that they would prefer to go to jurisdictions where these things are clearly permitted.”

The possible case outcomes appear endless. Courts may ultimately affirm that training models on protected content is covered under fair use. They might decide that the only legally defensible way to train models is through content licensing deals, which OpenAI is negotiating at the moment with dozens of publishers. (POLITICO parent Axel Springer struck its own deal with OpenAI in December.) The New York Times took the adversarial route, and if it prevails, the developer of ChatGPT will have to destroy any chatbot models and training data that took in its material.

And of course, Congress could always step in and establish a collective licensing agreement or some mechanism for rightholders to opt out of their creations getting swept up in training sets.

Adding to the uncertainty is the highly uneven global landscape. This adds complications domestically, too: Case law also hasn’t fleshed out the bounds of allowed activities after training an AI model in a different country. It could take more lawsuits to determine if it’s infringement to deploy a Japan-trained model in the U.S. — or reproduce, use, or sell its output here.

This might trigger worries about a “race to the bottom,” in which countries trying to woo AI businesses keep their copyright protections loose. But there’s a counterargument that regulatory clarity is a good thing for a cutting-edge industry, even if it’s a bit stricter than the industry would like.

Mollick says he has yet to witness any relocations, though a mass departure would likely intensify the call for some kind of government intervention.

“We are right now in a regulatory arms race, as jurisdictions are working to become AI-friendly in their industrial policies,” Abbott said. “If you saw an exodus of AI companies to what they perceived as friendlier jurisdictions, that would be a major pressure point for U.S. policymakers.”

 

Enter the “room where it happens”, where global power players shape policy and politics, with Power Play. POLITICO’s brand-new podcast will host conversations with the leaders and power players shaping the biggest ideas and driving the global conversations, moderated by award-winning journalist Anne McElvoy. Sign up today to be notified of new episodes – click here.

 
 
states tackle ai

The prospects of Congress regulating AI in an election year appear dim, meaning it may be up to the states to take matters into their own hands.

POLITICO’s Morning Tech laid out the landscape for state capitals in this morning’s edition for Pro subscribers, pointing to California as a potential legislative hotspot after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order in September ordering the state to study AI. Connecticut, which last year became the first state to pass legislation strengthening privacy laws involving AI, is also likely to continue studying and passing laws around the technology. Minnesota passed a law regulating political deepfakes last fall.

Some policy experts are warning, however, that these eager state regulators could create a confusing morass if the federal government doesn’t act — something Paul Lekas, senior vice president of global public policy at the Software and Information Industry Association, told MT could lead to “a patchwork that could be even more challenging than on the privacy front.” — Derek Robertson

crypto's trump bump?

FILE - Former President Donald Trump speaks during a commit to caucus rally, Dec. 13, 2023, in Coralville, Iowa. Trump's lawyers are pressing to have special counsel Jack Smith's team held in contempt. The Republican former president's lawyers said Thursday, Jan. 4, 2024, prosecutors have taken steps to advance the 2020 election interference case against him in violation of a judge's order that put the case on hold. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Former President Donald Trump. | AP

It’s fitting, really: Donald Trump, the celebrity billionaire former president of the United States, just might be the savior the crypto industry has been waiting for.

POLITICO’s Jasper Goodman reported this morning on the growing belief that Trump’s potential return to the White House would be accompanied by crypto-friendly staffing choices and policy preferences. If true, that would be in keeping with the technology’s growing association with GOP politicians and the right more broadly.

“The people that [Trump] would put in regulatory roles are much more likely to at least be crypto-open, if not overtly crypto-friendly, than this administration,” Brian Brooks, a veteran crypto executive and former top bank regulator under Trump, told Jasper.

The actual crypto lobby is largely trying to maintain a neutral stance, with Ron Hammond, director of government relations at the Blockchain Association, telling Jasper that he doesn’t “think it’s gotten more partisan.” Still, the facts don’t lie: If the 2024 campaign ends up a rematch between Trump and President Joe Biden, there’ll likely only be one candidate whose NFT you can buy. — Derek Robertson

Tweet of the Day

A chatbot being tricked into admitting it is a chatbot

THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS

Stay in touch with the whole team: Ben Schreckinger (bschreckinger@politico.com); Derek Robertson (drobertson@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com); and Christine Mui (cmui@politico.com).

If you’ve had this newsletter forwarded to you, you can sign up and read our mission statement at the links provided.

 

GLOBAL PLAYBOOK IS TAKING YOU TO DAVOS! Unlock the insider's guide to one of the world's most influential gatherings as POLITICO's Global Playbook takes you behind the scenes of the 2024 World Economic Forum. Author Suzanne Lynch will be on the ground in the Swiss Alps, bringing you the exclusive conversations, shifting power dynamics and groundbreaking ideas shaping the agenda in Davos. Stay in the know with POLITICO's Global Playbook, your VIP pass to the world’s most influential gatherings. SUBSCRIBE NOW.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Ben Schreckinger @SchreckReports

Derek Robertson @afternoondelete

Steve Heuser @sfheuser

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post