DECONSTRUCTION PROJECT — What would U.S. climate policy look like if former President Donald Trump succeeds in winning a second White House term later this year? Same as before, with more planning, Scott Waldman reports for POLITICO’s E&E News. Dozens of conservative groups have banded together to craft what they’re calling Project 2025. The effort, led by the Heritage Foundation and partially authored by former Trump administration officials, calls for ramping up fossil fuel production and decimating federal climate science, among other things. “We are writing a battle plan, and we are marshaling our forces,” said Paul Dans, director of Project 2025 at the Heritage Foundation. “Never before has the whole conservative movement banded together to systematically prepare to take power Day 1 and deconstruct the administrative state.” Trump was no friend to greens in his first term, during which he withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords, attempted to dismantle fossil fuel regulations and installed energy industry leaders in positions of power. But his plan to restructure NOAA with climate science critics failed, as did an effort to scrutinize the National Climate Assessment. All bets would be off if he wins a second term, said Will Happer, a climate skeptic who was an adviser to Trump’s National Security Council. After the plan to conduct a hostile review of the National Climate Assessment was scuttled, Trump assured Happer that he’d pick it right back up in a second term. “He said, ‘Well, we were going to do this, but it’s dragged on and on, the election is coming, and it’s the wrong time to start it. Let’s do this in my second term,’” Happer recalled about Trump. Though the lack of fear about reelection could embolden Trump on climate policy, it could backfire against him on the campaign trail, said Andrew Rosenberg, a senior official at NOAA during the Clinton administration. “Eight years ago, he might have had a more receptive audience, but I think that’s so much just his base now and his language has gotten so much more extreme, it just sounds bizarre,” said Rosenberg. “He seems even more out of touch to me given what’s happened in the last few years, given where the climate discussion is and where the nation is.”
|