Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Eli | Email Lauren PROGRAMMING NOTE: We’ll be off this Wednesday in recognition of Juneteenth but will be back in your inbox on Thursday, June 20. We hope absence makes the heart grow fonder. A few weeks ago, as the White House press shop worked to blunt the impact of a Wall Street Journal story suggesting President JOE BIDEN was “slipping,” some aides pointed the finger squarely at RUPERT MURDOCH, arguing that the media tycoon with well known conservative leanings was getting his empire into partisan form ahead of the election. That accusation turned out to be the opening salvo in what is now a very public war. Since that WSJ story dropped, Murdoch’s other media properties (most notably the New York Post) have caricatured the 81-year-old Biden as a senile, lost old man. The focus of their stories is hardly new. Biden’s diminished physical stature exists in plain sight and age and stamina have been a genre of White House reporting with several predecessors. Everyone around the president sees, among other things, that his gait has slowed and that he speaks more softly than before. But the New York Post stories have relied on selectively edited or decontextualized videos. And that’s led Biden’s team to take uncommonly public shots against the outlet. In the past few days, Biden aides have shared countless fact-checks and “Morning Joe” clips slamming the New York Post for amplifying these videos. They’ve warned of “cheap fakes,” a term coined by misinformation researchers, and “the bad faith actors who post them.” And they’ve painstakingly posted the full video clips that undercut some of the New York Post’s sensationalized headlines. Senior deputy press secretary ANDREW BATES alone has posted about the misleading videos more than 60 times in the past week. The White House comms shop has long had a contentious relationship with the New York Post’s reporter who covers the beat, STEVEN NELSON, and the paper’s coverage overall. But Biden aides viewed the recent flurry of New York Post stories as proof that their instincts about the Journal piece were correct. It wasn’t lost on the Biden team that the New York Post based its stories on videos that were selectively cut and shared online by the Republican National Committee, including one of Biden appearing “to freeze up on stage” at a Los Angeles fundraiser and another that made Biden look like he had wandered off from other heads of state during the G7 summit in Italy. (Wider shots of those events painted a different picture.) “The Murdoch outlets are so desperate to distract from @POTUS’s record that they just lie,” Bates posted on X, a reference to not just the New York Post’s coverage but the ubiquitous replaying of the videos on Murdoch’s Fox News (where they’ve been only occasionally contextualized). The White House has also emphasized that some of the fact-checks have come from right-leaning publications and individuals. According to two people familiar with the matter, the White House reached out to staff at the New York Post and pointed to the wide range of mainstream media fact checks, seeking a retraction of its story and front page headline. The paper flatly refused. A spokesperson for the New York Post declined to comment. But defenders of the paper note that the Biden team complained vociferously about its coverage before, encouraging other outlets to ignore the pre-2020-election reporting on the contents of HUNTER BIDEN’s laptop, under the auspices that it could be Russia disinformation. STEVEN CHEUNG, Trump campaign communications director, accused the Biden team of engaging in a “media-wide conspiracy.” There is a risk, of course, in Biden aides currently trying to shape reporting around the president’s age with a barrage of fact-checks. The Streisand effect comes to mind. (Though, speaking of, the actual BARBRA STREISAND ripped the New York Post for “printing lies” about Biden. “No other media outlets should amplify its disinformation,” she wrote on X.) Ultimately, however, the White House believes it must engage, in large part to keep these posts from spreading beyond right-wing outlets. Whether it can move fast enough is another question. It only took a few hours for the RNC’s videos of Biden at the LA event to get picked up by the New York Post, which was then shared by DONALD TRUMP on his social media platform. On social platforms like TikTok, the misleading videos spread faster than any fact check could. A Biden official said the campaign has established a taskforce to mitigate the risks posed by AI and cheap fakes, but stressed that the responsibility rests with social media platforms and news companies. “Voters deserve accurate information to inform their choice this November and our campaign will be vigilant in calling out these lies when we see them,” said Biden campaign spokesperson MIA EHRENBERG. “We hope media organizations and others with influential platforms follow our lead.” Although X ultimately added a banner to the New York Post story from the G7 noting that the video it was based on had been “cropped,” it’s not clear if putting pressure on such companies will have the desired effect. Other Democrats argue that the better solution may be to create a separate stream of content that overshadows the stuff that the New York Post and others are highlighting. “Ultimately how the President performs in high-profile moments like the debates will be exponentially more impactful than some clips circulating on TikTok,” said former Obama White House communications director DAN PFEIFFER. MESSAGE US — Are you RUPERT MURDOCH? We want to hear from you. And we’ll keep you anonymous! Email us at westwingtips@politico.com. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here!
|