Why Dems likely won’t budge on their spending demands

Presented by the Electronic Payments Coalition: An evening recap of the action on Capitol Hill and preview of the day ahead
Sep 09, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Inside Congress

By Jennifer Scholtes and Caitlin Emma

Presented by 

the Electronic Payments Coalition

With assists from POLITICO’s Congress team

Hakeem Jeffries emerges from his office at the U.S. Capitol.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries just laid out his side’s thinking in a letter to lawmakers, calling it “unserious and unacceptable." | Francis Chung/POLITICO

REPUBLICANS’ STOPGAP REALITY CHECK

Democrats, and some Republicans, are never going to back the six-month spending patch House GOP leaders are proposing as part of their stopgap funding bill this week.

Republican leaders in the chamber likely know they won’t be able to get Democratic signoff on their funding bill’s policy add-on, which requires proof of citizenship to register to vote. But there’s still some hope that Democrats, seeking a compromise to avert a still-unlikely government shutdown come Oct. 1, will bend on the timing aspect. Democrats have been advocating punting the shutdown deadline into mid-December, while the GOP legislation kicks it into March.

There are plenty of reasons to think Republicans won’t gain ground on that point, either. The arguments in favor of the December deadline are deeper than denying a potential Trump administration a hand in negotiating a final deal — some GOP lawmakers prefer an earlier deadline, too. Here’s why:

How this ends: While the GOP’s six-month proposal could win Speaker Mike Johnson some initial points with conservatives, the next three tumultuous weeks in Congress are likely to end with Johnson conceding to a couple-month spending fix, along with many other spending add-ons. (In a fresh veto threat on Monday, the Biden administration reiterated several extra non-negotiables, including billions of dollars more in disaster aid and more money for veterans health care than House GOP leaders are currently willing to provide.)

No supermajority: For months, top Republican appropriators have pointed to one major flaw in their hardliner colleagues’ strategy: More leverage next year won’t necessarily materialize, even if Election Day results in the GOP winning the House, Senate and the presidency.

The House’s top appropriator, Oklahoma Republican Rep. Tom Cole, has reminded his colleagues that there aren’t enough flippable seats in the Senate for either party to emerge with a supermajority next year. And that means a final funding deal would need bipartisan backing to clear the Senate next year, just like now.

Trump already tried: Congressional Republicans successfully punted a leftover funding negotiation to Donald Trump as he headed into his first term. But when the final deal came together in the spring of 2017, Trump didn’t win on any of his major demands.

Dems aren’t going to help: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries just laid out his side’s thinking in a letter to lawmakers, calling it “unserious and unacceptable” and urging Congress to pass a short-term stopgap funding bill “that will permit us to complete the appropriations process during this calendar year and is free of partisan policy changes.” The White House followed with its veto threat for the legislation, which could also give vulnerable Democrats cover to oppose it (the House vote margin on the GOP plan is going to be tight).

Defense-hawk disincentives: Pentagon leaders are warning that a six-month spending patch will do major damage to the military, including readiness goals and efforts to deter China, which could earn Republicans flak back home.

Another budget-cap threat: Remember that side deal President Joe Biden and ex-Speaker Kevin McCarthy made on the debt limit last year, which involved automatic cuts unless Congress passed a full spending plan by the end of April? That’s still relevant here. Defense hawks are eager to avoid another spring funding standoff that pushes up against that deadline.

The White House noted that cliff in its veto threat, warning that House Republicans’ proposal for a stopgap through March 28 is “dangerously close to the deadline when across-the-board cuts would come into place …”

Incumbents take the blame: Democratic candidates trying to pick off GOP incumbents in November would surely seize on any shutdown scare ahead of Election Day as fodder to attack sitting Republicans. And those hits could cost the GOP their House majority, as a couple of swing-district Republicans already warned Johnson this month.

— Jennifer Scholtes and Caitlin Emma, with help from Nicholas Wu 

GOOD EVENING! Welcome to Inside Congress, the play-by-play guide to all things Capitol Hill, on this Monday, Sept. 9, and welcome back from recess!

 

A message from the Electronic Payments Coalition:

DON’T BUY CORPORATE MEGA-STORES’ HYPOCRISY
Corporate mega-stores are pushing the ultimate hypocrisy. They want backdoor price controls to save money on credit card services they use, but have certainly increased prices on American families for essentials like eggs and milk. Don’t be fooled—learn how they flip-flop on government price controls.

 

SENATE LEADERSHIP RACE VIBE CHECK

The race to succeed outgoing GOP Leader Mitch McConnell has been rather sleepy in recent months, with many members hesitant to commit to any one candidate — at least publicly — until the actual vote is a bit closer.

But expect those running for the job to more actively work to recruit support behind the scenes — as evidenced by a new Monday letter from Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) to his GOP colleagues.

The letter, obtained by Inside Congress, outlined Cornyn’s priorities if he were to helm the conference next term. Cornyn is running against Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) for the job. He has committed to supporting term limits on the leader if he were to win the gig.

Some interesting Cornyn priorities we noticed …

  • Urging Republicans to “reject all attempts to nuke the legislative filibuster in the Senate.”
  • Focusing on prioritizing the “federal bench” as part of the Senate’s “special responsibility in confirmations.”
  • Calling on Congress to “review and reconsider all current federal spending.”
  • A “return to President Trump’s first-term policies” on border and immigration, and other legislative efforts on taxes and energy, among other issues. 

Between the lines: It’s unlikely we get a full sense of the race until closer to or after the November elections. More candidates could hop in, and the outcomes of the presidential and congressional contests will matter in the post-Election Day vote.

But those conversations between members will continue.

“I have benefited from many private conversations with members and look forward to many more,” Cornyn wrote. “The simple question raised repeatedly during this process sticks in my mind: What do members want in a new leader?”

Ursula Perano

 

A message from the Electronic Payments Coalition:

Advertisement Image

 

TRUMP SHOOTING TASK FORCE’S NEW ASK

The bipartisan House task force investigating the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump made its latest ask Monday — another sign the group is progressing in its investigation as Congress returns to Washington.

Reps. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Jason Crow (D-Colo.) — the task force’s chair and ranking member, respectively — sent a letter to the Pennsylvania State Police asking for information and documents by Sept. 16.

“The Task Force is investigating all actions by any agency, department, officer, or employee of the federal government, as well as state and local law enforcement or any other State or local government or private entities or individuals, related to the attempted assassination of Donald J. Trump on July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania,” they wrote.

Among the task force’s requests: Body cam and other footage, transcripts and recordings of any interviews conducted about the assassination attempt, and copies of radio communication. They are also requesting details on internal investigations, including a list of what inquiries are underway and when they will wrap, and copies of policies and plans related to July 13.

— Jordain Carney

HUDDLE HOTDISH

Every senator's desk was cleaned over recess, but Bob Menendez's was cleaned out.

Here’s what one senator did during his recess.

There’s a new vending machine on the Hill. And deputy Congress editor Tyler Weyant went for an afternoon pick-me-up cinnamon bun. (No word on if he immediately needed a nap after.) His take: “The bun is gigantic, could feed a policy team of 4. Honestly, for a treat a robot spit out at me, not bad! Rich in cinnamon flavor! Was unnerved by the countdown clock telling me when it would be ready.”

Sen. Patty Murray returned to her preschool teacher (and reporter?) roots.

You heard it here: Cups reads POLITICO.

Who’s opening the House floor? Young Kim to the rescue.

 

A message from the Electronic Payments Coalition:

DON’T BUY CORPORATE MEGA-STORES’ HYPOCRISY
Corporate mega-stores are pushing the ultimate hypocrisy. They want backdoor price controls to save money on credit card services they use, but have certainly increased prices on American families for essentials like eggs and milk. Don’t be fooled—learn how they flip-flop on government price controls.

 

QUICK LINKS 

This lawmaker lost her voice. AI gave it back, from Steven Overly.

NRSC chair will host fundraiser for Bashaw on Wednesday, by Joey Fox in The New Jersey Globe

US Senator Dianne Feinstein's Jewels Going to Auction, from Lauren McLemore in National Jeweler

Johnson’s future speakership could hinge on the spending fight, by Olivia Beavers and Jordain Carney.

Adam Kinzinger Says He Would Accept Cabinet Position In A Harris Administration; Calls Election Odds ‘A Coin Toss,’ by Matthew Carey in Deadline

TRANSITIONS 

Richard (Dick) Sauber is now a partner in Kramer Levin’s litigation, congressional investigations, and white collar defense and government investigations practices. He was previously special counsel to President Joe Biden, and is a VA alum.

Celia Glassman is now deputy director of policy and government affairs at AIPAC. She was most recently assistant director for legislative and regulatory policy at Ernst & Young, and is a Jim Risch, Marco Rubio and Sam Graves alum.

TOMORROW IN CONGRESS

The House and Senate are in session.

TUESDAY AROUND THE HILL

11:00 a.m. Congressional Gold Medal Ceremony in honor of the thirteen servicemembers who lost their lives on August 26, 2021 while stationed at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan. (Capitol Rotunda)

11:45 a.m. Tim Tebow and his foundation will hold a press conference to introduce legislation that will support the identification and rescue of victims of child sexual exploitation and abuse, with Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Reps Laurel Lee (R-Fla.) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) (Senate Swamp)

12:00 p.m. Reps. Terri Sewell (D-Ala.), Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.), and John Sarbanes (D-Md.), Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), et al on comprehensive federal voting rights legislation. (House Triangle)

4:00 p.m. CAPAC Chair Judy Chu (D-Calif.), Asian American leaders, et al on China Initiative Legislation (House Triangle)

Trivia

FRIDAY’S ANSWER: Andrew Schwartzman was the first to correctly guess that John F. Kennedy was the former senator (among other prominent roles in elected government) once won the Pulitzer Prize?

TODAY’S QUESTION, from Andrew: Which Olympic gold medalist in the decathlon served in the House?

The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@politico.com.

GET INSIDE CONGRESS emailed to your phone each evening.

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post