The cracks are already starting to show

Presented by Food & Water Action: Your afternoon must-read briefing on politics and government in the Golden State
Dec 11, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO California Playbook PM Newsletter Header

By Lindsey Holden

Presented by 

Food & Water Action

An overhead view of the California Assembly floor shows lawmakers working at their desks.

The California Assembly and Senate have each introduced different proposals for allocating "Trump-proofing" money through a special legislative session. | Rich Pedroncelli/AP

PRESSURE POINTS: Almost like clockwork, potential fissures are opening around the Trump-proofing (sorry to Gov. Gavin Newsom!) legislative special session.

Newsom wants to keep it narrowly focused on giving the California Department of Justice and other state agencies $25 million to prepare for legal battles with the incoming Trump administration.

The Assembly appears to be on board with this plan. But the Senate and some advocacy groups say that’s not enough. They want the state to chip in more like $60 million, with $35 million extra for local governments and legal aid for undocumented immigrants and other groups likely to find themselves in the new administration's crosshairs.

“We have to be ready on all fronts, and that takes time,” said Los Angeles state Sen. María Elena Durazo, a longtime immigrant rights supporter who is backing Senate efforts to provide additional money. “It takes resources to be able to put into place. We depend on community-based organizations. We depend on clinics. We depend on our social infrastructure to get the message across to our families: ‘Don't be afraid. Make sure your kids continue to go to school.’”

Senate Budget Chair Scott Wiener, who authored the $60 million funding bill, stressed his sense of urgency – and the need “to be ready in January.”

“Bad things can start happening very, very quickly,” he said.

As we’ve previously reported, Newsom and the Legislature don’t need a special session to expedite state money for various Trump-proofing initiatives. Lawmakers could theoretically in January introduce funding bills that would take effect the moment Newsom signs them into law — but that would be unusual. Proposals introduced outside of the special session wouldn’t necessarily carry the same political weight or be able to count on the governor’s approval.

Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel seems to prefer a narrower approach, and is carrying two bills: one with $25 million, as Newsom requested, and another chipping in $500,000 for initial legal case prep. But he didn’t close the door on providing more money for local governments and legal aid through the special session, telling Playbook the Assembly will be negotiating with the Senate and Newsom administration.

A spokesperson for Newsom's office said the team was reviewing both proposals and "actively collaborating with legislative leaders and the Attorney General."

Gabriel said Assembly Democrats have not “had an opportunity to have conversations about this." But, he emphasized, lawmakers are “very much constrained in the special session by what's in the governor's proclamation” and there’s “some benefit to really doing most of this work in regular session.”

“If we need to act quickly, if there's a reason to protect the interests of Californians, to protect their fundamental rights, to protect the interests of California taxpayers, if there's federal action that requires us to move quickly, we've proven that we have the ability to do that time and again,” he said.

IT’S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@politico.com.

 

A message from Food & Water Action:

Will Gov. Newsom side with the oil and gas industry or Californians after the “worst gas leak in US history?" In 2015, the Aliso Canyon Gas Storage Facility released 100,000 tons of methane and toxic chemicals, endangering public health. Governor Newsom vowed to shut down Aliso Canyon, but his Public Utilities Commission appointees voted to expand it. The PUC will decide Aliso Canyon’s future on December 19th. Learn more.

 
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY

Rob Bonta, left, and Shirley Weber take questions behind a podium.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber took aim at criticisms of California’s lengthy ballot-processing timeline during a briefing in advance of her office certifying the Nov. 5 election on Friday. | Damian Dovarganes/AP

FINAL COUNTDOWN: Secretary of State Shirley Weber today took aim at criticisms of California’s lengthy ballot-processing timeline during a briefing in advance of her office certifying the Nov. 5 election on Friday.

“People want us to certify elections and make predictions earlier,” Weber said. “We cannot do that. We record, and we present information, and we have deadlines that are given to us. We’re not the ones who create these deadlines that say Dec. 13, or whatever it may be.”

When asked whether some counties opted to count ballots more slowly due to a longer certification deadline, Weber said her office isn’t involved in that kind of monitoring.

“We don’t track and say, ‘You slowed down, you sped up,’” she said.

A bill from Assemblymember Marc Berman, a Bay Area Democrat, required county elections officials to wait until 28 days after the election to certify their vote counts, with the goal of providing clarity around deadlines for ballot curing.

Weber said that change, which sunsets in January, “put a lot of additional pressure on our staff because it gave us fewer days in which we had to basically certify the numbers that we had received from everyone.”

 

Billions in spending. Critical foreign aid. Immigration reform. The final weeks of 2024 could bring major policy changes. Inside Congress provides daily insights into how Congressional leaders are navigating these high-stakes issues. Subscribe today.

 
 
ON THE BEATS

Vince Fong speaks behind a microphone on the floor of the California Assembly.

California will hold a special election to fill former Assemblymember Vince Fong's Central Valley now-vacant seat. | Rich Pedroncelli/AP

EVEN MORE ELECTIONS: If you thought we were done with elections until 2026, you were sadly mistaken.

Newsom today declared special elections for Senate District 36 in Orange County and Assembly District 32 in the Central Valley.

The 36th District became vacant when former state Sen. Janet Nguyen resigned after winning election to the Orange County Board of Supervisors. The 32nd District is open after now-Rep. Vince Fong created an odd election snafu when he filed to run for former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s congressional seat after already declaring he would run for Assembly again.

Fong “won” his Assembly election, even though he encouraged voters to support his opponent. Now, another election will decide who represents the district.

Republican Stan Ellis announced today he’ll be running in that special election, and he already has the support of Fong, Rep. David Valadao and state Sen. Shannon Grove.

LIFE AFTER 1047 VETO: The academics appointed by Newsom to study potential guardrails for artificial intelligence after he vetoed a major AI safety bill laid out a timeline for the report on Wednesday. The study is likely to shape the direction of AI regulation in Sacramento next year.

The Joint California Policy Working Group on AI Frontier Models will issue a draft report in the first few months of 2025, receive feedback from various groups and then deliver a final study to the governor and Legislature by summer 2025.

That’s just enough time for lawmakers to make another go at passing an AI regulatory bill before the end of the session in Sacramento.

POLITICO Pro subscribers can read more here. — Julia Marsh

 

A message from Food & Water Action:

Advertisement Image

 
WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY

— Republicans who don’t play nice with Trump’s Cabinet nominees could face the wrath of MAGA allies and party activists. (POLITICO)

— California agencies are behind on progress reports detailing how well new laws are working. (CalMatters)

— A Marin County child who health officials believed may have contracted avian flu from drinking raw milk appears to have tested negative for the illness. (ABC News)

 

Write your own chapter in the new Washington. From the Lame Duck Congress Series to New Administration insights, POLITICO Pro delivers intelligence across 22+ policy areas to help you anticipate and navigate change. Discover how a Pro subscription empowers you. Learn more today.

 
 
AROUND THE STATE

— Pepperdine University students in Malibu describe watching the Franklin Fire burn on campus as they sheltered in the school's fire-resistant buildings. (Los Angeles Times)

— San Diego County supervisors banned local agencies from working with federal immigration officials. The sheriff said her office already follows state law and won’t change its practices. (San Diego Union-Tribune)

— Michael Lynne Thompson, an ex-Aryan Brotherhood member known for leaving the gang, was found guilty of perjury and Employment Development Department fraud in a Northern California court. (Sacramento Bee)

 

A message from Food & Water Action:

Will Gov. Newsom side with the oil and gas industry or Californians after the “worst gas leak in US history?" In 2015, the Aliso Canyon Gas Storage Facility released 100,000 tons of methane and toxic chemicals. SoCalGas’ disaster forced thousands to evacuate their homes to avoid further exposure to cancer-causing benzene and other chemicals.

SoCalGas took four months to seal the gas leak. Families near Aliso are still suffering the consequences. Instead of shutting it down like Gov. Newsom promised, the PUC allowed Aliso to expand by 3,000%, perpetuating the public health threat.

Over 150 organizations have come together to call for a shutdown of Aliso by 2027, but the PUC is considering kicking the can down the road instead of protecting communities. Gov. Newsom and allies should stand with families, not SoCalGas’ profits. On December 19th, the PUC will decide the future of Aliso Canyon. Learn more.

 
 

Subscribe to the POLITICO Playbook family

Playbook  |  Playbook PM  |  California Playbook  |  Florida Playbook  |  Illinois Playbook  |  Massachusetts Playbook  |  New Jersey Playbook  |  New York Playbook  |  Ottawa Playbook  |  Brussels Playbook  |  London Playbook

View all our political and policy newsletters

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post