THE BUZZ: CHAOS RULES — Conservative law enforcement leaders say they increasingly feel caught in a tug-of-war between California’s sanctuary law and President Donald Trump’s push to crack down on illegal immigration. And the White House's actions this week have made the picture even murkier — perhaps by design. District attorneys and sheriffs say they’re confused by polarizing forces: Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta insists Senate Bill 54 — a state law shielding undocumented immigrants — prevents police from cooperating with ICE agents. Trump, meanwhile, argues sanctuary laws are illegal and has threatened to prosecute officials who don’t assist with mass deportations. On Wednesday, the picture grew more complex after Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, requiring federal officials to detain migrants charged with crimes like shoplifting. It was the first bill Trump signed in his second presidency. Bonta and immigration advocacy groups agree the law doesn't apply to police and sheriffs in California. The act explicitly charges Department of Homeland Security employees with detaining undocumented migrants charged with crimes. “The federal government has their lane, and we have ours,” Bonta’s office said in a statement. “The Laken Riley Act focuses on federal immigration enforcement; it does not implicate SB 54.” But other top cops across the state said the law adds even more tension between Trump’s immigration plans and California’s sanctuary law. “It just adds more fuel to the fire of confusion,” Yolo County DA Jeff Reisig, an SB 54 critic, told Playbook. “As far as I'm concerned for the locals, frankly it puts people in local law enforcement into a difficult position.” Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, one of Trump’s closest allies in the state, released a statement arguing that state officials defending sanctuary laws are causing division by not allowing ICE to enter jails. He added, “Democrats in state government do not care about our law-abiding residents.” El Dorado District Attorney Vern Pierson — who sent Bonta a letter last week demanding an opinion about federal law’s precedence over SB 54 — said the passage of the Laken Riley Act is another “strong indication of bipartisan support” for removing migrants facing charges. It’s no surprise that enforcement officials more closely aligned with Trump see legal ambiguity at the same time those in deep-blue counties, such as San Francisco, insist there is no legal conflict because the federal courts upheld California's sanctuary law during Trump’s first term. Jordan Wells, a senior staff attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights in San Francisco, said immigrant advocates must “be on guard against local law enforcement misinterpreting” the new law. He said part of the concern is that it could provide a guise for “local law enforcement to racially profile or target immigrants.” Immigrant advocates said the ongoing chaos has caused undocumented people to stay home from work — or keep their kids home from school — if there are rumblings of ICE operations in the area. — with help from Rachel Bluth and Nicole Norman GOOD MORNING. Happy Thursday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as “CA Playbook” in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@politico.com and bjones@politico.com, or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE’S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. DON’T MISS IT: POLITICO AT USC — Join POLITICO’s own Christopher Cadelago, Sasha Issenberg and Jonathan Martin alongside other political luminaries like James Carville and Reince Priebus today at USC’s annual Warschaw Conference on Practical Politics. Throughout the day, panelists from politics, government, media and academia will discuss “The Trumping of America: Why and What’s Next.” Please register via Zoom.
|