GOP consumers aren’t sweating inflation. Democrats are panicking.

Presented by the Consumer Bankers Association: Delivered daily by 8 a.m., Morning Money examines the latest news in finance politics and policy.
Jan 31, 2025 View in browser
 
POLITICO Newsletter Header

By Sam Sutton

Presented by 

Sponsored logo

Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.

QUICK FIX

Want to out yourself as a Democrat? Say that you’re worried about inflation.

Partisan preference has always shaped how individuals view the health of the economy. But party affiliation is now a critical bellwether for inflation expectations as well, and the consequences of the growing political divide could scramble how Federal Reserve policymakers work to keep surging prices in check.

Republicans generally expected higher inflation than Democrats throughout President Joe Biden’s presidency, according to the University of Michigan’s monthly consumer sentiment survey. Still, from mid-2021 on, members of both parties said they thought prices would climb faster than the Federal Reserve’s annual target of 2 percent.

After Donald Trump won his second term, year-ahead inflation expectations for Republicans plummeted — dropping to just 0.1 percent in January, per Michigan’s latest survey — while Democrats said they thought prices would climb by a whopping 4.2 percent.

“It's disturbing because it's not a polarization of philosophy, it’s polarization of the perception of the facts — which is a more dangerous thing,” said David Kelly, the Chief Global Strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management. “For many years, we've known that people's perception of the economy was dependent on their party affiliation, but I must say this is the most dramatic swing that I've seen in terms of people's expectations on inflation.”

The Commerce Department will provide its monthly inflation update at 8:30 a.m. The consensus estimate among economists is that prices climbed at an annual rate of 2.8 percent in December, excluding food and energy costs.

Why does this matter?: Inflation expectations can be self-fulfilling. If the public believes prices are going to rise, they’ll spend more money now to get more bang for their buck. Businesses respond to stronger demand by raising prices. Higher prices — particularly during periods of low unemployment — can lead workers to ask their employers for better wages so they can keep up with rising costs.

But the reverse is also true. If expectations are anchored at-or-below the Fed’s inflation target, it will reduce the likelihood that prices will soar. Fed Chair Jerome Powell cited Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey as a major reason why the central bank moved ahead with jumbo rate hikes when inflation was spiking in mid-2022.

According to Joanne Hsu, who oversees the UMich survey, the divergence between Democrats and Republicans reflects a divide over how Trump’s plan to impose high tariffs on imports — possibly as soon as Saturday — will hit their pocketbooks. Democrats say they will drive up the cost of large purchases like cars and durable goods. Republicans say Trump’s agenda will bring down prices.

Critically, the policies that Democrats “are worried about don’t even need to be implemented for inflation to become a problem,” Hsu told MM. “It doesn’t matter if these partisan differences are rational or not, it matters if they start acting on it through their spending behavior.”

Why does it matter, pt. II: The growing divide between Democrats and Republicans could also mean that future inflationary shocks could have disparate effects depending on regions.

“If you’re looking at just the median, or just the average inflation expectation, you might be missing a lot,” Carola Conces Binder, an economics professor at the University of Texas at Austin, told MM.

Binder published research alongside Indiana University’s Rupal Kamdar and the University of Notre Dame’s Jane Ryngaert last year suggesting that Republicans’ unanchored inflation expectations during the Biden administration contributed to higher prices in parts of the country where the GOP is dominant.

“What the Fed can do to keep expectations anchored is somewhat limited, because expectations are now so dependent on politics,” Binder told MM.

“Central bank speeches and announcements won’t matter as much to consumer expectations as their political beliefs,” she added. “That makes it especially important that the Fed keep inflation steady or close to target.”

It’s FRIDAY — And your host is already thinking about how busy next week will be. The “debanking” hearing, the jobs report, maybe tariffs? What will drive economic policy and markets next month?. Let me know what you’re thinking and what I should be writing about. I’m at ssutton@politico.com.

 

A message from the Consumer Bankers Association:

One in five Americans don't have access to credit. That means many Americans in need will struggle to make ends meet under the CFPB's regulation of overdraft. This regulation disregards years of consumer-driven progress by banks to offer customers more flexible ways to handle short-term financial needs. It will ultimately reduce access to overdraft, harming consumers who rely on this lifeline to keep the lights on, feed their families, and pay rent in a pinch. Learn more.

 
Driving The Day

Commerce will release the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index for December at 8:30 a.m. … Agency reporting for the Treasury Report on Receivables and Debt Collection Activities closes for the first quarter of FY25

Here they come (maybe?)Trump reiterated his intention to slap Canada and Mexico with 25 percent tariffs on Saturday if they fail to address his concerns about fentanyl trafficking and migration, Ari Hawkins and Doug Palmer report.

The WSJ’s Gavin Bade, Vipal Monga and Santiago Perez write that Trump’s action may only affect sectors like steel and aluminum. Oil could be exempt.

— Trump’s comments, which he made while signing an executive order related to aviation safety, sent the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso tumbling, write Bloomberg’s Carter Johnson and Maria Elena Vizcaino. Major stock indices notched moderate gains throughout the day, per Reuters.

Thune’s dilemma — Farmers in Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s home state of South Dakota were hammered when other countries retaliated after Trump issued tariffs in 2018. Now the Republican leader is under pressure from other farm-state lawmakers and the agriculture industry to push back against the new administration as he charges into another trade war. As POLITICO’s Meredith Lee Hill and Jordain Carney report: “That’s a tall order.”

Adios — Following the Fed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Treasury on Thursday announced that it was withdrawing from an international group of regulators and central bankers that studies the financial risks of climate change, carrying out Trump’s directives to unravel Biden-era climate policies, Michael Stratford reports.

Jealous of this framing — The NYT’s Lydia DePillis: “Even Progressives Now Worry About the Federal Debt.”

 

Power shifts, razor-thin margins, and a high-stakes agenda. We’ve transformed our coverage—more reporters, more timely insights, and unmatched policy scoops. From leadership offices to committee rooms, caucus meetings, and beyond, our expert reporting keeps you ahead of the decisions that matter. Subscribe to our Inside Congress newsletter today.

 
 
Wall Street

Who’s Afraid of Liang Wenfeng?Not Masayoshi Son. Four days after the emergence of the Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek scrambled Wall Street’s view of Big Tech, The WSJ’s Berber Jin and Deepa Seetharaman report that the SoftBank CEO is weighing investing between $15 billion and $25 billion in Sam Altman’s OpenAI.

The final call on the Biden economy — The U.S. economy expanded by 2.8 percent last year, with fourth-quarter growth falling slightly below economists’ consensus, according to the AP. Consumer spending climbed by 4.2 percent even as business investment fell.

A run on Sutter’s Mill? — Demand for gold spiked to an all-time high on the weaker-than-expected GDP report, according to The WSJ’s Joseph Hoppe. Stockpiles of the safe haven asset are running low in London, per the FT.

What private equity lobbyists are readingBloomberg’s Martin Braun reports on the turmoil at a Long Island nursing home and memory care facility whose residents will be evicted pending a sale to Focus Healthcare Partners.

Albatross to asset — With Trump in the White House, Morgan Stanley is seeing more investor interest in the debt tied to Elon Musk’s 2022 acquisition of Twitter, Bloomberg’s Sridhar Natarajan, Carmen Arroyo and Reshmi Basu report. Key detail: “The financials also reflect X getting a bump from election-related buzz, posting about $400 million in Ebitda on $710 million of revenue in the last three months of the year — both higher than the two preceding quarters.”

 

A message from the Consumer Bankers Association:

Advertisement Image

 
Crypto

Crypto Bawl — The parents of disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried are exploring ways to convince Trump to pardon their son, who is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud, Bloomberg’s Ava Benny-Morrison reports.

Red flags — Trump megadonor Paul Singer’s hedge fund Elliott Global Management is warning that the new administration “is inflating a crypto bubble that ‘could wreak havoc,’” according to The FT.

 

New Year. New Washington. New Playbook. With intensified congressional coverage and even faster delivery of policy scoops, POLITICO’s reimagined Playbook newsletter ensures you’re always ahead of the conversation. Sign up today.

 
 
On the Hill

So… unfrozen?POLITICO’s Katherine Tully-McManus: “Russ Vought is one step closer to returning to the helm of the Office of Management and Budget, which threw Washington into confusion this week with sweeping orders to freeze federal grants and loans.”

Fly Around

ECB cuts As European policymakers fret the Trump effect, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde announced a quarter-point reduction in interest rates to 2.75 percent, writes POLITICO’s Johanna Treeck.

 

A message from the Consumer Bankers Association:

The CFPB's regulation of overdraft ignores the needs of the 1 in 5 Americans who lack access to credit.

Overdraft services, which must be clearly disclosed by law, provide a financial lifeline for those who actively choose to opt in. Removing access to these services would strip Americans in need of this informed choice, forcing many to turn to less-regulated, potentially riskier, and far more costly alternatives.

Banks know their customers want flexibility and choices. That's why banks have built new solutions and tools that provide more control and information to customers to help manage their money. By ignoring these efforts, the CFPB's regulation reduces access to overdraft services for those who need them most.

See how CBA is fighting to protect consumers' financial flexibility.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Mark McQuillan @mcqdc

Zachary Warmbrodt @Zachary

Victoria Guida @vtg2

Declan Harty @declanharty

Eleanor Mueller @eleanor_mueller

Katy O'Donnell @katyodonnell_

Sam Sutton @samjsutton

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO 1000 Wilson Blvd Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post