The federal workforce's growing digital anxiety

Presented by Spectrum for the Future: How the next wave of technology is upending the global economy and its power structures
Jan 30, 2025 View in browser
 
POLITICO Digital Future Daily Newsletter Header

By Alfred Ng

Presented by Spectrum for the Future

With help from Mohar Chatterjee and Derek Robertson

The logo for the Justice Department is seen.

The logo for the Justice Department is seen before a news conference at the Department of Justice, on Aug. 23, 2024, in Washington. | Mark Schiefelbein/AP

Federal workers are on edge after the Trump administration spent its first days dismantling long-held protections for career staffers.

There’s another safeguard that government employees worry the Trump administration will kneecap before it even gets off the ground: protecting them from online harassment.

Hostile online posts, podcasts and videos, which can lead to real-life threats and intimidation, have been a rising concern for government employees over the last four years.

FBI agents involved in the August 2022 search on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort had their personal information posted online, leading to threats against their family members, too. Four in ten election officials said they had concerns about being doxed in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, according to a letter from the Senate Judiciary Committee sent last September. And Justice Department attorneys handling Jan. 6 prosecution and immigration cases have also been targeted for harassment online and doxing, according to a letter sent from staffers last October.

Doxing, which the Justice Department defined in a Jan. 10 memo sent to department leaders as “the malicious act of publicly sharing personal information with the intent to intimidate, harass, or threaten,” has become more common in public-service jobs because of an accessible market for people’s information online, combined with divisive partisanship.

The memo, sent out in the waning days of the Biden administration, implemented a new set of guidelines for DOJ employees affected by online threats. It came after a group of staffers pushed for more protections against online harassment. The vulnerability extends across the entire federal government, Steve Lenkart, the executive director of the National Federation of Federal Employees union, told POLITICO in December.

“No agency has come out and said if you’re doxed, this is what we can do for you, this is what you should do. That doesn’t exist and needs to exist federal-wide,” he said.

Lenkart told POLITICO at the time he hoped the outgoing Biden administration and federal agencies would start to establish guidelines for workers responding to online harassment, Now, however, he's more pessimistic: He said the first actions of the Trump administration — such as executive orders cutting back job protections — made him feel that these protections would not be a priority.

The DOJ and Office of Personnel Management declined to comment, and a representative for Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi did not respond to a request for comment on improving protections against online harassment for government workers. The White House also did not respond to a request for comment on whether they would uphold the goals laid out in the memo.

Employees, however, are paying attention. Dana Gold, the director of the Democracy Protection Initiative at the Government Accountability Project, has seen growing interest in government training on employee safety. She said more than 270 federal employees showed up for a December session she held on whistleblower rights and how to protect themselves from being doxed.

Rob Shavell, the CEO of the data deletion request company DeleteMe, said his company has seen a 250% increase in public sector organizations signing up across federal and state agencies from 2023 to 2024, correlating with the rise in threats and harassment against government workers.

The DOJ Gender Equality Network — a group representing nearly 2,000 employees whose October letter spurred the department's policy — specifically asked the agency to provide access to identity protection services. The letter detailed the story of a Jan. 6 prosecutor who called the services a "lifesaver" after she was doxed and threatened online.

Without a resource that automatically sends data deletion requests to companies that sell people’s information, federal workers are left to send individual requests to each business, many of which do not have to comply if the request comes from one of the 31 states without a data privacy law.

In a demonstration of the problem faced by government employees, one DOJ staffer, who saw a right-wing influencer use their name, job title and photo in a post calling for their firing, moved to scrub all of their sensitive personal information online. The staffer, who POLITICO is granting anonymity to prevent further online harassment, faced several obstacles sending requests to data brokers to delete information, which included their address and phone number.

“It took me an hour to request the removal of my information from just two websites,” the staffer told POLITICO. “Six days later, my information was still up on one of them. There’s no way this would’ve worked in time had it been an emergency.”

Federal workers concerned about this threat do not expect the Trump administration to help with these risks, and have started paying for their own subscriptions out-of-pocket. The NFFE’s Lenkart, who represents about 110,000 federal workers, said these resources will eventually become a necessity if federal workers continue to be targeted for online harassment.

He’s paid for a data deletion service himself, and recommends that federal workers who feel at risk of being doxed do the same.

“They’ve given no indication that they care at all about the safety of federal employees,” Lenkart said about the Trump administration.

 

A message from Spectrum for the Future:

Outdated spectrum policies mandating only exclusive, high-power licensing boost Chinese government-supported manufacturers – and make America less safe. It's time to put America first by prioritizing proven spectrum sharing technologies – an American innovation, led by American companies, that protects national security while increasing competition and lowering costs. Learn more.

 
openai pulls out all stops in washington

This illustration photo produced in Arlington, Virginia on November 20, 2023, shows a smart phone screen displaying the logo of OpenAI juxtaposed with a screen showing a photo of former OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders' Week in San Francisco, California, on November 16, 2023. Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images

The OpenAI logo on a smartphone and a photo of Sam Altman. | Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images

Sam Altman made the case in Washington Thursday for more investment after the DeepSeek Chinese AI startup created a model to rival OpenAI’s chatbot for less than $6 million, sending tech stocks plunging and shaking confidence in U.S. innovation. Altman spoke days after he appeared at the White House to announce Stargate, an investment of up to $500 billion in AI infrastructure in a joint venture with Softbank, Oracle and MGX.

The investment was “a really good thing to be doing” in light of DeepSeek, Altman said, arguing that while OpenAI could make its models more efficient, the company needed computational firepower to stay ahead of the curve.

Altman was in D.C. to announce a partnership to run its models on the Los Alamos National Laboratory’s supercomputer. Thomas Mason, director of Los Alamos, said the partnership creates “the opportunity to change the slope of scientific progress.”

Among the crowd were top Republicans influencing AI policy, Interior Secretary nominee Doug Burgum, Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Lynne Parker, a White House tech adviser. — Mohar Chatterjee

 

A message from Spectrum for the Future:

Advertisement Image

 
u.k. investigates deepseek

United Kingdom security officials are probing Chinese AI company DeepSeek, although the details of the investigation remain unclear.

POLITICO’s Tom Bristow and Pieter Haeck reported for Pro subscribers on the inquiry, which comes after DeepSeek’s R1 model shocked the world by matching or outperforming OpenAI’s state-of-the-art models for a fraction of the training cost. Britain’s Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told POLITICO, “We scrutinize every innovation of the size and scale and impact of DeepSeek and we will make sure that it goes through the right system … I just want to reassure people in Britain … the system that we have will look at this as it does at every other innovation and make sure that safety is there from the onset.”

DeepSeek’s achievement has also inspired investigations by Italy and Ireland. German newspaper Zeit reported that the country is investigating whether the company should be regulated, starting by an inquiry into its data processing. On Tuesday the U.S. Navy banned DeepSeek technology citing “security and ethical concerns.”

 

Power shifts, razor-thin margins, and a high-stakes agenda. We’ve transformed our coverage—more reporters, more timely insights, and unmatched policy scoops. From leadership offices to committee rooms, caucus meetings, and beyond, our expert reporting keeps you ahead of the decisions that matter. Subscribe to our Inside Congress newsletter today.

 
 
post OF THE DAY

At an Economic Times event in India, Sam Altman states it is 'totally hopeless' for a small team to compete with OpenAI on training foundation models, June 2023.

The Future in 5 links

Stay in touch with the whole team: Derek Robertson (drobertson@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com); and Christine Mui (cmui@politico.com).

 

A message from Spectrum for the Future:

America won't win the global race for wireless leadership with a spectrum policy that's stuck in the past. We must build on the proven success of U.S. spectrum sharing to protect our national security and create jobs – protecting critical radar and missile defense systems without forcing the U.S. military to waste $120 billion or more relocating critical defense systems.

China is pushing its top-down, command-and-control spectrum playbook on the rest of the world to create a bigger market for companies like Huawei and ZTE. American spectrum policy needs to put America first, protecting critical defense systems and leaning into spectrum sharing technologies developed here in the U.S. and led by American companies. Learn more.

 
 

New Year. New Washington. New Playbook. With intensified congressional coverage and even faster delivery of policy scoops, POLITICO’s reimagined Playbook newsletter ensures you’re always ahead of the conversation. Sign up today.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Daniella Cheslow @DaniellaCheslow

Steve Heuser @sfheuser

Christine Mui @MuiChristine

Derek Robertson @afternoondelete

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO 1000 Wilson Blvd Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post