Cleaving open the Pandora’s box on taxpayer privacy

Delivered every Monday by 10 a.m., Weekly Tax examines the latest news in tax politics and policy.
Jun 26, 2023 View in browser
 
POLITICO's Weekly Tax newsletter logo

By Benjamin Guggenheim

Driving the day

THE TAX ANGLE: Allegations of political interference in the Hunter Biden tax case by two IRS whistleblowers rippled through conservative media as well as a wide range of other outlets over the weekend, giving Republicans a potent issue to hammer the Biden administration with heading into the 2024 election.

It's particularly notable that, because of the public release of case information that is normally only available to federal prosecutors, there's really no shortage of details — pertaining, for instance, to allegations of gifts the president’s son received, slow walking by the Justice Department and procedural irregularities in the IRS investigation — for Republicans to draw on from the 14 hours of whistleblower testimony they released.

“This is a corrupt organization,” Sean Hannity said of Justice on Fox News. “They went to great lengths to protect Joe and Hunter Biden from ever, ever facing criminal charges despite what is a mountain of damning evidence.”

The Wall Street Journal editorial board asserted on Thursday that “Democrats counting on Mr. Biden in 2024 would be wise to pay attention” to the IRS whistleblower testimony.

However, besides the content of the allegations, which our Ben Schreckinger explored in much greater detail here, there’s an entirely different story that could be written about the developments from Thursday — centering on how both Republicans and Democrats seem increasingly willing to disregard statutory protections and norms surrounding taxpayer privacy to further their respective political agendas.

Specifically, the Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee was only able to release the trove of documents to the public by invoking Chair Jason Smith's unique authority under section 6103 of the tax code to request and review private taxpayer information.

But just half a year ago, Republicans had widely decried Democrats’ use of the very same authority to publish former President Donald Trump’s tax returns as an unleashing of a “dangerous new political weapon that reaches far beyond the former president, overturning decades of privacy protections for average Americans that have existed since Watergate” — as Kevin Brady, the GOP ranking member of the committee at the time, put it.

WELCOME TO THE WEEK: And back to that in a moment. But now that Republicans are suggesting zeroing out U.S. funding for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in their appropriations legislation, we’ve got to wonder how folks over in Paris will be watching the 2024 presidential campaign.

Cutting support for the OECD is but one retaliatory measure (retaliatory taxes are another) that Republicans could wield against countries seeking to fully implement the OECD’s 15 percent global minimum tax.

Send us your thoughts and ideas. We’d love to hear them.

Email: bfaler@politico.com, bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com.

Or Twitter: @tobyeckert, @brian_faler, @ben_guggenheim, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO POWER SWITCH: The energy landscape is profoundly transforming. Power Switch is a daily newsletter that unlocks the most important stories driving the energy sector and the political forces shaping critical decisions about your energy future, from production to storage, distribution to consumption. Don’t miss out on Power Switch, your guide to the politics of energy transformation in America and around the world. SUBSCRIBE TODAY.

 
 

Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories.

TAX PRIVACY: Given how section 6103 authority has proven to be such a politically powerful tool for partisan lawmakers who seek to discredit the front-runners in the 2024 presidential campaign, it’s not exactly a stretch to speculate that lawmakers could start turning to the authority more and more frequently to further their investigations of similarly powerful people.

Indeed, take the recent controversy over gifts that billionaire Harlan Crow reportedly lavished on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas over multiple decades: Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has repeatedly requested gift tax information from Crow and accused the billionaire of stonewalling his inquiries, but Wyden has also made it clear that he would consider all tools at the committee’s disposal to obtain Crow’s tax receipts.

Those tools include authority to request private tax information under section 6103.

Hypothetically, by using Crow's and Thomas' private tax returns Wyden would not only be able to see the full extent of the reported gifts and whether Crow considered the gifts to be "transfers of substantial value," but also whether Thomas listed his great nephew as a “dependent child” on his tax returns.

As you may recall, a colleague for Thomas had argued that the justice did not need to report private school tuition payments Crow provided for Thomas’s great nephew on annual disclosure forms because a great nephew is not considered a “dependent child” under the Ethics in Government Act.

That's all to say there are many, many ways in which both Republicans and Democrats could use 6103 to explore alleged ethics violations at the Supreme Court and other institutions going forward.

THE LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE THRESHOLD: Technically, in order to use section 6103 authority, the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees need to justify the authority with some sort of "legislative purpose."

Democrats, for instance, said that requesting and reviewing President Donald Trump’s tax returns was necessary to assess the functionality of and consider reforms to an IRS program that mandates audits of all sitting presidents and vice presidents.

However, as George K. Yin of University of Virginia Law School wrote in a scholarly treatise on section 6103, the requirement that there be a legislative purpose for such inquiries is essentially unenforceable because legislators and their staff are granted absolute immunity from any prosecutions related to legislative acts by the Constitution's Speech or Debate clause.

To prevent abuse of Congress’s powers to publish private taxpayer information, Yin suggests that Congress could enact an institutional waiver that waives tax-related inquiries from this immunity.

Yin also proposes appointing a staff intermediary who could be the sole designated agent for reviewing private tax information. That intermediary would be in a position to help investigators by retrieving information deemed central to the legislative inquiry but also act as a backstop against politically motivated disclosures.

However, the bottom line is this: Even though several lawmakers have said they are extremely reluctant to publish tax returns belonging to a private citizen in any scenario, we’re not hearing any calls for reforms to section 6103.

At the same time, lawmakers are quickly learning that the tool can be an extraordinarily powerful and effective political cudgel that they can use to damage their opponents.

And a quick notable update on the IRS allegations: You might have seen that Attorney General Merrick Garland insisted U.S. Attorney David Weiss had full authority to pursue charges against Hunter Biden, despite whistleblower claims that Weiss was denied requests to bring charges in California and Washington D.C., as well as a request for special counsel status.

Well, on Friday the lawyers for one of the whistleblowers, IRS special agent Gary Shapley, issued a statement naming six witnesses to an October 6, 2022, meeting in which Weiss allegedly told prosecutors he did not in fact have authority to charge in those districts. We'll be keeping tabs on these developments.

IRS CUTS: If you thought that the $21.2 billion IRS budget cut agreed to in the debt ceiling deal between Speaker Kevin McCarthy and President Joe Biden was enough to satiate Republicans, you’re going to have to think again.

As we reported last week, Republicans advanced appropriations legislation that includes a $10.2 billion rescission from Inflation Reduction Act funds for the agency in addition to a $1.2 billion cut (23 percent) from the IRS’s annual enforcement budget.

“By slashing $1.2 billion from the IRS from their enforcement program… this legislation would benefit scammers, fraudsters, cheaters, billionaires, big corporations and those who are well-connected at the expense of hard-working Americans,” said House Appropriations Committee ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.).

Around the World

FT: “Scrapping ‘non-dom’ tax perk would net £3.6bn a year for UK, says study”

ABC: “Paris climate summit ends without a deal on global tax on shipping

Reuters: “Yara narrows new 'blue' ammonia site choice to two to tap U.S. tax credits

Around the Nation

L.A. Times: “Lawmakers cut a grand deal for Hollywood: Refundable film tax credit and new set safety rules

AP: “Tax cuts and a UW squeeze: A look at the proposed GOP-backed Wisconsin state budget

Forbes: “GOP House Bill Would Hobble IRS, Bar Funds From Being Used To Protect Commissioner

Also Worth Your Time

Guardian: “‘I’m embarrassed about how horribly overpaid I was’: tax campaigner Dan Neidle

Bloomberg: “Nigeria’s Oil Goes Unsold as Tax Clawback Shakes Confidence

Did you know?

There’s a basketball court on the top floor of the Supreme Court.

 

STEP INSIDE THE WEST WING: What's really happening in West Wing offices? Find out who's up, who's down, and who really has the president’s ear in our West Wing Playbook newsletter, the insider's guide to the Biden White House and Cabinet. For buzzy nuggets and details that you won't find anywhere else, subscribe today.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Toby Eckert @tobyeckert

Bernie Becker @berniebecker3

Brian Faler @brian_faler

Benjamin Guggenheim @ben_guggenheim

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to unsubscribe.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post