Good morning and welcome to the Monday edition of the New York & New Jersey Energy newsletter. We’ll take a look at the week ahead and look back on what you may have missed last week. CONGESTION PRICING GREEN LIGHT OUTRAGES NEW JERSEY — POLITICO’s Ry Rivard: Federal transportation officials are giving a final green light to New York’s plan to toll drivers coming into parts of Manhattan, members of the New Jersey congressional delegation say. Sen. Bob Menendez and Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Bill Pascrell, all New Jersey Democrats, said they are “outraged” after hearing the Federal Highway Administration will not require New York to do more outreach and environmental studies before putting in tolls that will affect New Jersey drivers. The New Jersey trio said highway officials are moving ahead with a “Finding of No Significant Impact” document about congestion pricing. In May, highway officials issued a letter approving the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority environmental assessment and issued a draft impact finding, which was out for 30 days of public review. New Jersey opponents of the tolling plan had hoped to get the administration to reconsider that decision and make MTA do a more exhaustive environmental impact statement, which could delay a tolling plan that has been repeatedly delayed. “This is nothing more than a cash grab to fund the MTA,” the New Jersey Democrats said in a statement to POLITICO. “There is no excuse for FHWA and the Department of Transportation’s failure to require New York to meaningfully engage with stakeholders across New Jersey and to not adequately consult the New Jersey congressional delegation and other elected officials.” The New Jersey delegation got wind of the administration’s sign off and its plans to publish something in the Federal Register this week. After that, the MTA officials have said they would need about a year to set up the new tolling infrastructure. New York supporters, including environmental activists and transit advocates, argue the tolls will help reduce traffic, improve air quality and help the MTA improve its service. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a fellow Democrat, said earlier this month he is preparing to lawyer up to challenge the tolling plan and he has threatened to hold up business at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to get back at New York. PAYING FOR WIND — The New Jersey Assembly and Senate’s budget committees are both expected to take up legislation Tuesday meant to save the state’s first offshore wind farm from rising costs that imperil the project. The move, just before the June 30 state budget deadline, suggests they could be on a fast track. The legislation would save energy company Orsted’s plan to put 100 turbines 15 miles off the South Jersey coast to generate power for 500,000 homes. The project, known as Ocean Wind 1, is supposed to be finished next year but has yet to begin construction as Orsted worries it can’t make money from the deal because of inflation, higher interest rates and supply chain issues. This bill would change a 2019 deal, allowing Orsted to keep tax credits that didn’t exist when the Board of Public Utilities approved Ocean Wind 1 four years ago. Supporters argue the tax credits are still helping customers by helping the company pay for the project, even if the money isn't going directly back to customers. Opponents will argue Orsted has gotten enough from the state and if it’s project can’t pencil out, it should not build it. The bills are scheduled to be taken up in the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee at 11 a.m. on Tuesday and by the Assembly Budget Committee at 1 p.m. on Tuesday. The Assembly bill is A5651, the Senate bill is S4019. — Ry Rivard PLANNING FOR WIND — New York and New Jersey need offshore wind energy to meet climate goals and transmission lines that are coming can benefit communities, according to a new report from the Regional Plan Association and Karp Strategies. The association, a not-for-profit organization that makes planning recommendations for the tri-state region, has not often focused on energy issues but has taken an interest in offshore wind. The report, titled “Making Offshore Wind Transmission Work for Communities,” takes stock of a new industry in America that, in RPA’s estimation, will require cooperation from numerous coastal communities, plus inland communities that host transmission lines to bring power ashore. “We wanted to make sure this process around transmission is better understood,” said Robert Freudenberg, RPA vice president for energy and environmental programs. “These are projects that are happening, we want to make sure everyone involved can benefit from the outcome.” The report, done in conjunction with Karp Strategies, an urban planning group with experience in offshore projects, comes just as offshore wind has become a major political issue in both states. It lays out all the different projects, their locations and various timelines. The group’s insight and support could come in handy right now for offshore wind developers and carbon-free energy advocates. Offshore wind foes view each onshore transmission line's landfall as a pain point to try to block offshore wind farms. Now, New York utilities are preparing for one of the most ambitious transmission projects in America – a multi-gigawatt power line to connect multiple offshore wind farms and route the power into New York City. The report also serves as a sort of tip sheet about how offshore wind supporters might want to communicate about transmission projects. The report includes a video of a roadway in Long Island where a transmission line has been installed. Though the road was torn up to lay the cable, it was repaved and it would be nearly impossible for a layperson to tell the line was there. Rebecca Karp, the CEO and founder of Karp Strategies, said the key is to build coalitions of supporters, engage early, center “equity and justice,” and consider so-called community benefit agreements, which are packages of money or benefits that developers provide communities hosting offshore wind infrastructure. That last part has been key to winning hearts and minds in some communities. The benefits include typical industrial policies, like workforce development plans, but also things the community needs, like daycare or a new bus stop for workers or donations to local nonprofits. “There is really an opportunity to mitigate risk of delay, of lawsuits, of misinformation,” Karp said. — Ry Rivard HAPPY MONDAY MORNING: Let us know if you have tips, story ideas or life advice. We're always here at mfrench@politico.com and rrivard@politico.com. And if you like this letter, please tell a friend and/or loved one to sign up.
|