SACRAMENTO TO SEC — California played its hand on compelling companies to come clean on carbon emissions. Now it’s up to the Securities and Exchange Commission to decide whether to follow the Golden State’s lead or go its own way, Jordan and Declan report. Landmark legislation passed in Sacramento this month requiring corporations to disclose both their emissions and the business risks they pose is reverberating in Washington as SEC Chair Gary Gensler weighs one of the agency’s most controversial rules. California’s legislation, which Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he will sign, might give the SEC political and legal cover to go strong in finalizing the agency’s own climate disclosure rule — but it’s not clear whether Gensler will take it. The main sticking point at the SEC is how to handle Scope 3 emissions, those generated throughout a company’s supply chain. While California would require both publicly traded and privately held companies to report those emissions, the initial SEC rule proposed 18 months ago would only apply to public companies and only compel Scope 3 disclosures where they are deemed material or are specific to an emissions reduction goal. Scope 3 emissions have drawn criticism from business interests and political opponents of the SEC rule, who have complained that they would be difficult to track and would impose undue financial burden on farmers and other small suppliers. California’s legislation will eliminate a significant part of that argument, according to John Coates, a former acting head of corporation finance at the SEC who now teaches at Harvard. “For every $1 billion company operating in California — which is a lot of them — the costs of complying with whatever the SEC will require in effect falls,” Coates said. “So in some ways that makes it easier as a pure cost-benefit analysis matter for the SEC to justify doing something that either matches or maybe is modestly looser than the California rule.” “But on the pure politics, I don’t know,” Coates said. The pure politics means the SEC is likely to come under fire from Republicans and the business groups whenever it issues its final rule and is almost certain to face legal challenges to whatever it releases. And the track records of both Gensler and the agency he leads suggest that they are unlikely to be swayed significantly by Democrats in Sacramento and will go their own way. “I don’t think that will move the needle at all in anybody’s mind at the SEC,” Coates said. And then there’s this: If the SEC adopts a weaker rule, some analysts expect it would set off a wave of business lobbying for California and other states considering similar efforts like New York to water down their rules to align with the federal agency.
|