LAWYERS, GUNS AND MONEY: That didn’t take long. Gun rights advocates sued the state today – just minutes after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law new rules on concealed weapons permits. Never mind that the legislation, Senate Bill 2, was specifically tailored to get around limits set by the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Bruen” ruling on firearm restrictions. “With Gov. Newsom’s signing of SB2 today, California continues to exhibit its disdain for the rights of Californians, the U.S. Constitution, and the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision,” said Cody J. Wisniewski, general counsel of the Firearms Policy Coalition, said in a statement. Newsom and other California officials are eager for the fight. Newsom today signed a slate of gun regulations, including SB 2. The legislation by state Sen. Anthony Portantino specifies that licensed owners can’t carry concealed weapons in “sensitive areas,” such as schools, parks, voting booths, sporting arenas and public transit. It also bars issuing permits to people charged with certain crimes, including the reckless use of a firearm. Newsom stood alongside legislators and Attorney General Rob Bonta this morning to celebrate the signing. "We're taking action to ensure that those we trust to carry firearms in public are responsible, law-abiding citizens,” Bonta said, referencing the Supreme Court’s decision. “This bill follows the blueprint of the Bruen decision. It is Bruen-compliant.” Newsom has made gun regulation a key plank of his platform as he continues to grow his national profile. The Legislature earlier this year passed his resolution calling for a constitutional convention to craft an amendment to regulate firearms, including a national assault weapons ban. The governor this morning also signed Assembly Bill 28, by Jesse Gabriel, installing an 11 percent tax on ammunition and firearms. Newsom has been reluctant to approve new taxes and some advocates worried he might veto this measure, which would generate about $160 million per year for programs to prevent gun violence. "I see this a little bit differently," he told reporters. "This is not a general income tax, or a corporate tax. This is, in my perspective, more of a sin tax."
|