Bitcoin bounces back

How the next wave of technology is upending the global economy and its power structures
Mar 20, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO's Digital Future Daily newsletter logo

By Derek Robertson

Pedestrians walk past a display of cryptocurrency Bitcoin.

The Bitcoin logo on a display. | Anthony Kwan/Getty Images

Bitcoin, in case you haven’t heard, is back.

The premier cryptocurrency hit an all-time high of $73,794 last week, in the midst of a months-long rally following widespread pronouncements that cryptocurrency was “dead.” Spurred by both the long-time-coming SEC approval of the first Bitcoin ETF and a flood of pro-crypto money into the political system, cryptocurrency has resurfaced in the public imagination to an extent not seen since the days of Larry David and Tom Brady hawking it during the Super Bowl.

Even amid the triumph, there have been continual reminders of how fickle any speculative market tends to be: The volatile, novelty-based memecoin market continues to invite scrutiny, and Sam Bankman-Fried still can’t seem to stay out of the news.

The devout have continued to believe in crypto’s promise all along not just as a get-rich-quick scheme, but as a vehicle for financial independence from traditional markets and data surveillance. For them, this year’s rally has become an opportunity to take a long-delayed victory lap — often, as it turns out, on the graves of bygone platforms like Bankman-Fried’s FTX.

“The recent Bitcoin rally was built on the solid foundation of the collapse of FTX, Celsius, 3AC, and other firms who engaged in dangerous or fraudulent practices,” said Steven Lubka, managing director at the Bitcoin firm Swan. “This new capital has come from brokerage accounts and advisors, who present a much more stable base to the market than what was flushed away in 2022-2023,” he continued, projecting a bull run into 2025 “at least.”

Lubka’s comments are typical of the optimism that powers institutional Bitcoin. But what’s different now, compared to the hype- and scandal-ridden era to which he compares today favorably, is that the institutional crypto ecosystem has matured far beyond just, say, SBF’s (alleged) polycule moving in secret behind various subsidiaries. The new suite of ETFs, an expanded presence for crypto on the Hill, and the fading memory of the industry’s various scandals has given newfound credibility to crypto companies’ claims to be doing something beyond just helping speculators make a quick buck.

“The primary driver of price action at the moment is likely the massive and consistent inflows of billions of dollars of funds into the newly launched Bitcoin ETFs, a process that is just getting started,” said Alex Gladstein, the crypto-loving director of strategy at the nonprofit Human Rights Foundation.

Gladstein predicted that the upcoming “halving” of Bitcoin, or the process by which the rewards users reap for adding blocks to the blockchain is greatly reduced, would lead to another spike in its price and drive further development of the software and policy ecosystem around the technology. (Gladstein’s organization promotes crypto as what he called “freedom money,” or a tool to skirt the surveillance of authoritarian regimes.)

But with an increasing market share, of course, comes increasing scrutiny. Sometimes that overlaps with politics, as crypto becomes an increasingly partisan issue — with Republicans promoting a vision of crypto-powered financial freedom and eyeing government-sponsored central bank digital currencies warily, while Democrats stake out ground as consumer defenders on the lookout for hucksters and speculators. And SEC Chair Gary Gensler hasn’t gone soft on crypto despite the ETF approval, seeking out $158 million to enforce securities law in the market.

Just as before, however, the biggest risks to crypto might come from within the market itself. Crypto’s major selling point is its “immutability” — a crypto token is as unique and irreplaceable as a gold bar, giving it a promise of security and endurance that crypto’s boosters say “fiat money” (i.e., the U.S. dollar) lacks. But sometimes that can be a drawback: Bloomberg’s Matt Levine covered in his newsletter yesterday the (seeming) downfall of “Slerf,” a memecoin on the Solana blockchain whose entire value developer “Slerfsol” just happened to eradicate in an instant.

“Guys I fucked up,” the developer wrote on X. “I burned the LP and the tokens that were set aside for the airdrop. Mint authority is already revoked so I can not mint them. There is nothing I can do to fix this. I am so fucking sorry.”

In other words: I pressed a button and all your money’s gone, sincerest apologies. As Levine pointed out, “If a company just lost its list of shareholders, it could probably, like, go back through its emails and reconstruct the list.” But this is not how crypto works: That very “immutability” that its boosters tout can also lead to irreparable losses from innocent error, fraud or a cyberattack.

Luckily for bereft Slerf investors, and much like the crypto market itself, they got a second chance. Leveraging the crypto community’s thirst for novelty, the increased attention led to a 5,000 percent spike in the coin’s value at its next issuance. The wacky ups-and-downs of various memecoins might seem a long distance away from the staid world of ETFs, high-dollar lobbyists, and global human rights, but the fundamental technology remains the same.

 

YOUR GUIDE TO EMPIRE STATE POLITICS: From the newsroom that doesn’t sleep, POLITICO's New York Playbook is the ultimate guide for power players navigating the intricate landscape of Empire State politics. Stay ahead of the curve with the latest and most important stories from Albany, New York City and around the state, with in-depth, original reporting to stay ahead of policy trends and political developments. Subscribe now to keep up with the daily hustle and bustle of NY politics. 

 
 
letters to the newsletter author

In yesterday’s DFD, I wrote about the tendency for TikTok to push its users toward more radical politics. Today, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation president Daniel Castro emailed me pushing back on one of the newsletter’s key claims, that “if your sole reason for being on TikTok is to do politics, you are probably doing some form of extreme politics — or at the very least imitating the extremists.” His response is below:

“One of the most successful US politicians on TikTok is Rep. Jeff Jackson who is known primarily for his centrist views. (Ironically, he is getting roasted on TikTok at the moment for voting in favor of the ban.) [The House’s legislation would not ban the app, but force its sale. — ed.]

But Rep. Jackson showed that the key to success on TikTok (and other social media platforms) isn’t extremism but connecting with people. He famously almost never mentions his political party in his videos, focusing instead on explaining policy, behind the scenes activities in Congress, and his positions.

I’d argue that political extremism on social media is the equivalent of when a comedian goes for a cheap laugh. Or when media outlets use clickbait. It’s unoriginal and unsophisticated, but yes, it works. But the choice is still up to the politician (or comedian or media outlet). They can still be successful with moderate content, but it might take more work. That’s why I’m more likely to blame the politicians who embrace extremism (and the voters who support them) rather than shifting that responsibility to the platforms.”

an unlikely alliance

As the geopolitical tech competition between China and the West heats up, one tech-friendly European nation is trying to keep a foot in both worlds.

POLITICO’s Clothilde Goujard reported yesterday on the growing ties between China and Ireland, where popular Chinese e-commerce apps like Temu and Shein are powering Ireland’s tech sector. Just like American firms including Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple, Chinese firms also see the value of Ireland’s friendly tax regime and access to the European Union but that could be endangered by the growing tension between east and west.

“Ireland has often been a voice for human rights in multilateral forums. China is antithetical to all those things and is a repressive authoritarian regime,” Dan Baer, senior vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Clothilde, adding that the nation “has a long record of deepening economic ties cheerfully, often providing significant economic benefits and then using ties for their political benefits and influence when it chooses.”

Tweet of the Day

Wow. Slorg didn’t say that? He’s not burning tokens on the Slerf Team? I didn’t know that.

The Future in 5 links

Stay in touch with the whole team: Derek Robertson (drobertson@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com); and Christine Mui (cmui@politico.com).

If you’ve had this newsletter forwarded to you, you can sign up and read our mission statement at the links provided.

 

JOIN US ON 3/21 FOR A TALK ON FINANCIAL LITERACY: Americans from all communities should be able to save, build wealth, and escape generational poverty, but doing so requires financial literacy. How can government and industry ensure access to digital financial tools to help all Americans achieve this? Join POLITICO on March 21 as we explore how Congress, regulators, financial institutions and nonprofits are working to improve financial literacy education for all. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Ben Schreckinger @SchreckReports

Derek Robertson @afternoondelete

Steve Heuser @sfheuser

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post