HOMESTRETCH — The House calendar lists five sitting days until the summer break, but fishbowlers know the chamber always adjourns early in the final week. Place your bets on adjournment day. Senators typically stick around town a few days longer as they deal with last-minute bills.
— Status report: Parliament has passed 12 bills into law since September — fewer than the 20 pieces passed during the same period last year. As the pre-election clock ticks down, ministers are aware their window for turning priorities into laws of the land is closing. — This week's priorities: Government House Leader STEVEN MACKINNON has identified four bills for debate: → Bill C-69 is Finance Minister CHRYSTIA FREELAND’s 672-page budget bill, which includes a whopping 24 measures highlighted in the minister’s press release — each of which is fodder for an “echo” announcement or BBQ small talk. → Bill C-65 amends election laws to remove barriers to voting, including by introducing a three-day election period. This is a plank of the Liberal-NDP governing deal. C-65 would also push the next scheduled election date back a week to Oct. 27, 2025, which would allow MPs first elected in 2019 to remain in office long enough to qualify for a full pension. The NDP wants to ax that part of the bill. → Bill C-40 would create an independent commission that would oversee applications for review on the grounds of miscarriage of justice, to free wrongfully convicted individuals faster. C-40 was a personal priority of former Justice Minister DAVID LAMETTI. → Bill C-26, first introduced in 2022 by former Public Safety Minister MARCO MENDICINO, aims to “bolster cybersecurity across the financial, telecommunications, energy and transportation sectors.” → Not on the list: Bill C-64, which gets the legislative ball rolling on a national pharmacare program. Look for plenty of noise on that one as soon as Parliament returns in September. FOREIGN INTERFERENCE — It's hard not to play the Hill's newest parlor game. Redacted documents inevitably breed curiosity, particularly when they’re about national security and foreign interference. When names of parliamentarians who “wittingly” served the interests of foreign states are blacked out, a big ol’ game of Clue breaks out — and every armchair national security expert thinks they know whose handle is protected by black ink. The whispers were abundant all last week. — Clear as mud: Green Leader ELIZABETH MAY and JAGMEET SINGH appeared to disagree about NSICOP's findings, though May subsequently kinda sorta agreed with Singh, the Globe's CAMPBELL CLARK reported. May will have more to say on the subject at a press conference this morning. Foreign Minister MÉLANIE JOLY told CTV's “Question Period” that the report does not name any sitting Liberal MPs, Late last week, Prime Minister JUSTIN TRUDEAU poured cold water on NSICOP's findings. “We made clear some concerns we had with the way that NSICOP did, drew conclusions,” the PM told reporters after the G7 summit. “I think that is an important part of the process.” → Meanwhile, in the Senate: Bill C-70, which introduces among other measures a foreign agent registry, is in the Red Chamber after a unanimous House vote at third reading. A Senate committee was already studying C-70, which sits at second reading in that chamber. → Tomato, tomato: There isn't even unanimity on how to pronounce the committee's name. Most public officials say ENTZ-ih-cop in front of the cameras. The committee's longtime chair, DAVID MCGUINTY, has said that for years. So has the prime minister, and a long line of Cabinet ministers. But some public servants have a different spin on NSICOP behind closed doors: ehn-ess-eye-cop. → We kid, but do we? Three recent reports on foreign interference have flagged serious communication issues between departments and officials. No wonder the government can't get on the same page about how to sound out a crucial committee's name. — What's next: A whole lot more talk. Singh won’t yank the NDP's support for the government, even as he accuses Trudeau of dropping the ball on foreign interference. Conservative Leader PIERRE POILIEVRE still refuses to obtain the security clearance to read the unredacted report. |