Will there be reaching across the aisle?

Presented by American Council of Life Insurers: Delivered every Monday by 10 a.m., Weekly Tax examines the latest news in tax politics and policy.
Jun 10, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO's Weekly Tax newsletter logo

By Bernie Becker

Presented by 

American Council of Life Insurers

EXTEND YOUR HAND: It’s one of the big currently unanswerable questions hanging over next year’s big tax negotiations: How bipartisan might they be?

Recent history suggests that both parties will try to go it alone if they take full control of Congress and the White House in November’s elections.

But new polling from American Policy Ventures, a group advocating for more collaboration in Washington, found a big majority of voters hoping that Democrats and Republicans do work together when it’s time to address a wide range of expiring Trump-era tax provisions.

The survey of 1,500 voters from Cygnal found that seven in 10 were more likely to back someone who “prioritizes working across the aisle to achieve the results on extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.” (The full poll is to be released Tuesday, with the tax findings shared ahead of time with Weekly Tax.)

About one in five respondents weren’t sure how to answer the question, while about one in 10 said that they preferred a lawmaker who consistently stood “with their party even if no progress is made” on extending those temporary provisions from the 2017 GOP tax law.

MORE ON THIS IN A BIT — but, as always, we appreciate you all joining us for Weekly Tax. Here’s hoping we can all see the day when a wheelbarrow can drive 55 (mph).

Unclear what might have been caught in a bottle: Today (potenially) marks 272 years since a Philadelphia man named Benjamin Franklin flew a kite during a thunderstorm, as he sought a better understanding of the link between lightning and electricity. (Was this definitely the date? Most certainly not.)

Got a scoop with a little heat? Send it our way.

Email: bbecker@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com, bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com.

You can also reach us on X, formerly Twitter, at @berniebecker3, @Brian_Faler, @ben_guggenheim, @tobyeckert, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax.

Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories.

 

A message from American Council of Life Insurers:

Life insurers create financial certainty in an uncertain world.
Life insurers were born from the idea that no one should be on their own in hard times. 175 years ago, that meant providing relief after an unexpected loss. Today, it means helping families take care of what matters most. Life insurance helps families keep homes, pay for college and safeguard small businesses during difficult times. Learn about our commitment to affordable financial protection here.

 

EXTEND YOUR HAND, CONT’D: There likely are some caveats in those findings, to be sure.

It might not be that surprising that, in a vacuum, voters prefer bipartisan action to partisan hardball, so those survey findings might be tested when actual policymakers delve into the actual details on those expiring policies in 2025. (Some might conceivably quibble with the wording of the polling question as well.)

Still, Paolo Mastrangelo, the co-founder of American Policy Ventures, said it was still key for lawmakers to hear that deep voter interest in bipartisanship.

Mastrangelo said the expectation for many folks on Capitol Hill already is that next year’s tax debate will be a partisan exercise, and that it would be good for them to hear that their constituents might not believe that a positive outcome.

“The poll shows that a stark majority of Americans, regardless of party affiliation, want Congress to work together on TCJA. This should make Members of Congress think twice, take a step back, and consider the upsides of engaging in real bipartisan conversations,” Mastrangelo told Weekly Tax.

Looking ahead: It’s certainly true that some of the opening moves for next year’s tax debate have at least implied that Republicans and Democrats would like to figure out the end result amongst themselves.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise has openly talked about using budget maneuver called reconciliation early in 2025 to extend all the expiring TCJA provisions should GOP get the full sweep in November, while the tax teams formed by Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) to discuss next year’s situation are Republican-only.

To be fair, Republicans do seem the more likely to win all of the House, Senate and presidency this fall.

And it’s also worth noting that the talk about what might happen next year isn’t fully focused yet — a good number of people in both parties, for instance, are talking about how the need for fiscal restraint might color the debate over extending tax cuts.

Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, seems more likely to push for even further tax cuts on top of what’s expiring at the end of 2025.

Bottom line: A big challenge for any bipartisan cooperation next year will be what are very real differences between the two parties on tax policy, with Democrats continuing to push for higher taxes on the rich and corporations. (More on that in a bit.)

A Trump addendum: The former president said at a Las Vegas rally on Sunday that scrapping taxes on tipped income would be a top priority for his potential second term. “When I get to office, we are going to not charge taxes on tips,” Trump said, via The Washington Post.

That might not be bad politics in Nevada, a swing state with a strong service sector. But at this point, it’s tough to say whether taxes on tipped income will be a hot-button issue in the broader tax discussions.

LET’S RAISE SOME TAXES: American University’s Institute for Macroeconomic & Policy Analysis is out with a new paper today arguing that higher taxes on capital gains and dividends wouldn’t drag down economic growth.

In fact, the new brief argues that President Joe Biden’s budget proposal — practically doubling the rate on capital gains and dividends, from 20 percent to 39.6 percent, on households making more than $1 million a year — would even spark the slightest bump in economic growth.

Ignacio Gonzalez, an economics professor at American and one of the brief’s authors, told Weekly Tax that he didn’t think those findings should be particularly provocative — pointing, among other things, to research that found that the Bush-era tax cut for dividends had little impact on investment.

“Somehow, many people still believe wrongly that a decline in these types of taxes is a powerful mechanism to incentivize investment,” Gonzalez said, adding that increasing the rate on capital gains and dividends also help to boost the progressivity of the tax system — “because they’re not distortionary, and they target something that we know has been most of the cause in wealth inequality.”

The new paper comes as Biden and other Democrats have been floating a variety of new methods for increasing taxes on the accumulated assets of the very rich.

Gonzalez and his co-authors, Juan Montecino, and Vasudeva Ramaswamy, argue that taxes on capital gains and dividends don’t have much bearing on long-term growth or the business decisions of companies, particularly very established companies, because those taxes are levied after investment decisions have already been made.

Combined, Biden’s capital gains and dividends proposals would boost GDP by 0.43 percent over a decade, according to the American paper.

Those findings, as Gonzalez himself acknowledged, are sure to not be universally accepted.

Other experts have found that lower taxes on capital gains might encourage more investment and economic growth, but that other factors were more important. More conservative-leaning experts, meanwhile, do believe that higher capital gains taxes drag down investment — noting, among other things, that levies on capital gains taxes essentially layer a second level of tax on top of the corporate income tax.

Erica York of the Tax Foundation added to Weekly Tax that higher capital gains rates can cause investors to simply hang on to their assets for tax reasons, which can distort investment decisions, and can incentivize immediate consumption over savings.

 

JOIN US ON 6/12 FOR A TALK ON THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY: As air travel soars again, policymakers and airlines are grappling with a series of contemporary challenges to the industry's future. Join POLITICO on June 12 for a topical and timely conversation with government leaders and aviation stakeholders about the state of the airline industry. From what passengers want to what airlines need amid the high demand for air traffic, workers and technology solutions. What can Washington do to ensure passengers and providers are equipped to fly right? REGISTER HERE.

 
 
Around the World

Bloomberg: “UK’s Labour Party U-Turns On Plans for Tax-Free Pension Limit.”

Also Bloomberg: “Trudeau to Call Vote on Contentious Tax Change This Week.”

Reuters: “Resistance to new Brazil tax credit rules will dissipate, minister says.”

Also Reuters: “Billionaire Mordashov criticises Russian government over tax 'stability.'”

Around the Nation

Hartford Courant: “CT legislators will be back at work in June to fix tax glitch.”

WPRI: “Key RI House panel may vote on bank tax change sought by Citizens.”

Honolulu Civil Beat: “Honolulu’s New Budget Includes Higher Property Taxes For Short-Term Rentals.”

 

A message from American Council of Life Insurers:

Advertisement Image

 
Also Worth Your Time

Wall Street Journal: “At End of Trump Tax Cuts, Progressives See Leverage to Target the Rich.”

Washington Post: “Republicans pitch tax cuts for corporations, the wealthy in 2025.”

Bloomberg Tax: “High Court Estate Tax Ruling Forces Succession Planning Revamps.”

On The Calendar

We’re easing on into your workweek.

Let Morning Tax know about your future events: taxcalendar@politicopro.com.

 

JOIN US ON 6/13 FOR A TALK ON THE FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE: As Congress and the White House work to strengthen health care affordability and access, innovative technologies and treatments are increasingly important for patient health and lower costs. What barriers are appearing as new tech emerges? Is the Medicare payment process keeping up with new technologies and procedures? Join us on June 13 as POLITICO convenes a panel of lawmakers, officials and experts to discuss what policy solutions could expand access to innovative therapies and tech. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
Did you know?

Benjamin Franklin was awarded the prestigious Copley Medal, awarded by the Royal Society of London, for his work on electricity.

 

A message from American Council of Life Insurers:

90 million American families depend on life insurers to help them build financial security, no matter what life brings.

Life insurers make certain that Americans can care for themselves and those they love in good times and bad. Life insurer products – life insurance, paid leave, supplemental benefits, retirement savings, personal pensions and more – are there for people whenever they need it. In fact, life insurers paid out $187.2 billion in life insurance and annuity benefits in 2022.

Our guaranteed products – their availability, accessibility and affordability – help people live and retire with financial peace of mind. Learn more about life insurers’ commitment to creating more financial certainty here.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Toby Eckert @tobyeckert

Bernie Becker @berniebecker3

Brian Faler @brian_faler

Benjamin Guggenheim @ben_guggenheim

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post