In terms of increasing votes, Trump's pick of JD Vance doesn't make much sense. He's a senator from a currently red state (where he didn't perform as well as much of his cohort). He's extreme on issues like abortion where Trump is trying to soften the message. He's been strikingly critical of Trump in the past. He once called him a ‘moral disaster,’ and possibly ‘America’s Hitler.' As I said yesterday, with the pick of JD Vance, Trump locks up the already committed angry white males who have nothing to be angry about vote. So what gives? Dan Pfeiffer explains what goes into picking a VP candidate and why Trump (with a big push from his top funders) chose this one. It's not about running the election. It's about running the country. "Donald Trump does not give two shits about governing. He’d likely struggle to explain how a bill becomes a law or distinguish between an executive order and a presidential memorandum. His knowledge of the responsibilities of the cabinet agencies under his administration would likely be lacking as well. However, Trump picked Vance for the same reasons George W. Bush picked Cheney — someone who has the smarts and know-how to implement the MAGA agenda. Trump may not even know this is why he picked Vance, but it’s why so many people behind Project 2025 supported Vance’s appointment." Trump Picked Vance to Make Project 2025 a Reality. 2Cord Cutting"Doctors rarely use cord blood anymore, thanks to advances that have made it easier to transplant adult stem cells. And the few parents who try to withdraw cord blood samples often find that they are unusable — either because their volume is too low or they have been contaminated with microbe." But those facts don't stop Cord Blood Banks from marketing to expecting parents. They convinced me nearly two decades ago and I only just recently got the company to stop hounding me for payments. NYT (Gift Article): Promised Cures, Tainted Cells: How Cord Blood Banks Mislead Parents. 3Breaking News and Nervous Breakdowns"The basic facts held attention for only so long before being supplanted by wild speculation—people were eager to post about the identity of the shooter, his possible motives, the political ramifications of the event, the specter of more violence. It may be human nature to react this way in traumatic moments—to desperately attempt to fill an information void—but the online platforms so many of us frequent have monetized and gamified this instinct, rewarding those who create the most compelling stories." Charlie Warzel in The Atlantic (Gift Article): This Is What Happens When News Breaks. (Interestingly enough, I wrote a book on this topic! Please Scream Inside Your Heart: Breaking News and Nervous Breakdowns in the Year That Wouldn't End.) 4And the Horse You Flew In On"While swimmers can shove a Speedo in a back pocket and runners can stash a pair of track spikes in a backpack, other Paris-bound athletes face an Olympian challenge in getting their equipment — from boats to guns to horses — overseas for these Summer Games." WaPo (Gift Article): Horses, guns and swords: How cumbersome equipment gets to the Olympics. 5Extra, ExtraThe Best Laid Plans of Mice and Menendez: The legal system still works (at least for people not named Trump). "A jury on Tuesday found Sen. Bob Menendez guilty on all counts in his federal corruption trial, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer swiftly called on his Democratic colleague to resign." 6Bottom of the NewsThis drone video shows what it’s like to climb to Mount Everest’s summit. (I watched the whole thing without the help of supplementary oxygen.) Read my 📕, Please Scream Inside Your Heart, or grab a 👕 in the Store. |