MINING MOMENTUM — Critical minerals are getting a fresh look in Washington. The bipartisan infrastructure law and Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act provided billions in grants, loan authority and tax credits to build up domestic supply chains for the raw materials needed to power electric cars and other clean energy technologies of the future. But if there’s one point of agreement between companies and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, it’s that those efforts haven’t been enough to dent China’s dominance. Despite federal subsidies, investors and potential customers are skeptical that domestic suppliers can overcome Beijing’s efforts to maintain its stranglehold. China in recent years has flooded the global market with cheap minerals and undercut Western projects, according to U.S. officials and the International Energy Agency. That’s led to American projects being canceled or put on hold, even those that were in line for federal support. Struggling U.S. firms have pleaded with the government to go beyond supporting capital costs for construction of new mines and processing facilities and to take a more active role in the minerals markets. One proposal being considered by the Biden administration is a financial backstop under which the government would set a price floor and agree to pay specific U.S. minerals producers the difference when market prices fall below that threshold. Other companies and groups, including the bipartisan House select China committee, have proposed a national mineral strategic reserve — similar to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve — which would go a step further than a backstop by physically purchasing and selling the minerals to stabilize prices. Such policies would “send an important signal to potential investors” that the federal government is committed to the minerals effort, even though it has faced criticism from industry for leaving leeway to automakers to keep sourcing some Chinese minerals, said Todd Malan, chief external affairs officer at Talon Metals, which is developing a nickel mine and processing plant in the U.S. Reps. Rob Wittman (R-Va.) and Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who lead a minerals working group on China panel, recently told the POLITICO Energy podcast that they plan to introduce a legislative package before the end of the year that could establish price supports or fund a strategic reserve. A bill produced by the Select China Committee is likely to carry extra weight given that a broad bipartisan majority voted to establish the panel last year. Senate leadership has also prioritized countering China, and members of the upper chamber have introduced several bipartisan critical minerals bills this year. That includes a pair of bipartisan bills introduced Friday by Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) — first reported by POLITICO — that would force the federal government to develop a national strategy to spur U.S. production of the critical minerals, which they pitched as a first step before further action. Still, the push is unlikely to bear much fruit in the thick of an election year. Republicans and Democrats disagree over how aggressively to move in disentangling supply chains from China, and former president Donald Trump has seized on the fight to attack the Biden administration’s climate spending, which the GOP nominee says is worsening dependence on Beijing. That partisanship could be difficult to overcome and make it unlikely there would be action in the lame duck session of Congress after the election, no matter who wins the White House. “There is opportunity for bipartisan work here,” said Emily Domenech, senior vice president at Boundary Stone Partners who was a senior policy adviser to House Speaker Mike Johnson and his predecessor Kevin McCarthy. “We are seeing a lot of issues migrate into this China competitiveness space because there is a lot more room for bipartisan cooperation that way, but I’m not sure the coalition needed will be ready for prime time before the end of the year.
|