The move to push abortion off the ballot

Your definitive guide to women, politics and power.
Sep 13, 2024 View in browser
 
Women Rule logo

By Katherine Long

A hand holds a paper over a blue backdrop featuring silhouettes of Nebraska, Florida and Arkansas.

Illustration by Jade Cuevas/POLITICO

Hey Rulers! Today marks 52 days until Election Day. As Nov. 5 inches closer, ballot certification is well underway in states across the country.

On that note, let’s get to it:

Voters in 10 states will decide on abortion-related measures this November. But the fight to get — and keep — these measures on the ballot rages on.

A majority of these measures were citizen-initiated, led by citizen groups that require a certain number of signatures in order to qualify for the ballot. One measure, which would have given Arkansas voters the opportunity to soften the state’s near-total abortion ban, was blocked by the state Supreme Court in August.

The majority-conservative court sided with Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, a Republican, who argued that the group had not turned in the proper paperwork by the June 27 deadline and failed to certify all paid canvassers.

For abortion rights activists, the decision was met with disappointment, anger and frustration, according to Rebecca Bobrow, the director of strategy at Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the proposed abortion measure.

“[We are] feeling very much like this was a concerted, unethical effort to keep us off the ballot by any means necessary,” Bobrow tells Women Rule.

Now, AFLG’s legal team is determining whether or not the group will appeal the decision.

“Even if there’s not legal recourse here, there’s likely to be some political recourse,” Bobrow says.

“The voters are going to remember this in November. ”

Abortion rights activists in the state are pivoting their focus to the race for chief justice in November, when Arkansas Supreme Court Justices Rhonda Wood and Karen Baker will face off. Wood wrote the majority opinion for the court’s decision to block the abortion measure, with Baker dissenting.

But the loss of an abortion measure on the ballot is devastating for voters, Bobrow says.

“Many of them do feel like their constitutionally-protected right to engage in direct democracy is being sort of pulled away from them,” Bobrow says. “For all Arkansans, this not being on the ballot means that there’s not an opportunity to restore reproductive rights.”

In states where abortion measures did make the ballot, the fight continues. Nebraska is the only state with two competing abortion-related measures on the ballot this November. One measure would codify the right to abortion up to fetal viability, or roughly 20 to 25 weeks, while the opposing measure would enshrine the state’s current 12-week ban, which includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the pregnant woman.

The state Supreme Court on Monday heard arguments on three cases seeking to remove either one or both of the competing Nebraska measures from the ballot. Two of the cases argue that the abortion-rights measure violates a state rule that voter-initiated measures only cover a single subject. The other argues that the competing measures should both be on the ballot, and if not, both should be removed. The court ruled Friday that both measures will remain on the ballot.

Attorneys from the Thomas More Society, who are challenging the measure’s place on the ballot, argue that the abortion-rights measure includes “remarkably misleading terms” and is “unconstitutionally riddled with separate subjects,” according to court records.

Protect Our Rights is behind the campaign seeking to get the abortion-rights measure on the ballot in Nebraska. Allie Berry, the group’s campaign manager, calls the attempts to remove the measure a “distraction.”

“Our campaign is the only thing standing in the way of extreme politicians' end goal: a total abortion ban in the state. We know the majority of the people and medical providers are on our side. We're hopeful the Court will do the right thing and let people vote,” says Berry.

Berry says that the opposing initiative enshrining the 12-week abortion ban created challenges during the signature collection process.

Opponents used tactics to deceive voters in order to get signatures for their anti-abortion measure, Berry says, including spreading misinformation and claiming that their initiative would protect abortion rights. (A spokesperson from the Nebraska Family Alliance, a nonprofit supporting the anti-abortion measure, did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.)

“And we’ve already seen the repercussions of that, with over 300 people choosing to remove their name from the signature collection phase,” Berry says.

Despite these difficulties the Protect Our Rights initiative secured 207,000 signatures, far surpassing the roughly 120,000 needed to reach the ballot.

In Florida, Amendment 4, a measure to limit government interference with abortion, is slated for the ballot. If enacted, the measure would overturn the state’s current six-week abortion ban. While the measure has faced legal opposition from anti-abortion activists, opponents are using other avenues to fight the measure’s implementation. Presidential candidate Donald Trump, a Florida resident, initially criticized the state’s abortion ban. The statements led to backlash from anti-abortion advocates and the former president backtracked those statements a day later, saying he would oppose Amendment 4.

“Amendment 4 is dangerous, deceptive, and extreme. It would allow abortions at any time and for almost any reason, including late-term abortions when a baby can feel pain,” Florida first lady Casey DeSantis writes in a post.

Meanwhile, Florida state police are going to homes of local voters to question their decision to sign the petition supporting the initiative, and a new website launched by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration includes language criticizing the measure. The DeSantis administration also said it is investigating “fraudulent activity” in the petition-signing process.

On Thursday, the ACLU of Florida and Southern Legal Counsel filed a joint lawsuit on behalf of Floridians Protecting Freedom, the group behind the abortion rights measure. The suit aims to block AHCA’s use of information it deems “false and misleading” and argues that “AHCA’s website, television, and radio advertisements contain inflammatory, false, and misleading statements that misrepresent Amendment 4.”

Lauren Brenzel, the campaign director for Yes on 4: Floridians Protecting Freedom, says the state “will stop at nothing to keep their extreme abortion law.”

“Florida's government fears the will of the people, coming after our freedom of speech and engaging in voter intimidation. … The state is blatantly ignoring the will of Floridians and undermining our freedoms,” Brenzel says.

In order for citizen-initiated measures to reach the ballot in Florida, they need to cross a threshold of over 890,000 signatures, or 8 percent of the electorate in the state’s congressional districts. Other states require between 100,000 and 300,000 valid signatures. The Florida measure garnered slightly over 997,000 signatures.

It will need support from 60 percent of voters to pass this November. A recent poll from the University of North Florida’s Public Opinion Research Lab found that 69 percent of voters in the state favor passing Amendment 4.

For Brenzel, who uses they/them pronouns, the momentum and energy from voters who support Amendment 4 is a hopeful sign.

“It wasn’t hard to get Florida voters to sign this because they want to see an end to this ban,” Brenzel says. “Thirty-five percent of our signers for our petition were Republican or independent voters,” Brenzel says.

Since the 2022 Dobbs ruling, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, abortion rights measures have won consistently in state elections with support often bleeding across party lines.

Noreen Farrell, executive director at nonprofit Equal Rights Advocates, tells Women Rule this bodes well for abortion rights measures in this election.

“Citizen-initiated constitutional amendments are a really powerful tool that is being used to let voters place abortion on the ballot without directly involving the legislature or governor,” Farrell says.

As she sees it, the intense pushback against the ballot measures “reflects a widening of strategies that anti-abortion activists and groups are employing to make sure that these … initiatives never see the light of day.”

POLITICO Special Report

Hadley Duvall speaks on stage during the Democratic National Convention.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The Young Woman Making Kamala Harris’ Strongest Case on Abortion Rights,” by Kathy Gilsinan for POLITICO: “The day after Labor Day, swing-state polls were showing Donald Trump and Kamala Harris locked in a ‘dogfight’ or a ‘showdown’ or even a ‘knife fight in a phone booth,’ depending on the news outlet. That morning, a young Harris surrogate named Hadley Duvall was in the battleground state of Arizona, having breakfast with some staffers, looking friendly and serene. She’d been deployed there — as she has to several swing states since delivering a stunning speech to the Democratic National Convention — to tell her story as a survivor of incest.”

Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris for president” by Anthony Adragna for POLITICO: “‘I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election,’ Swift wrote in a post to her Instagram account. ‘I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.’”

Harris introduces herself — by eviscerating Trump” by Christopher Cadelago and Eli Stokols for POLITICO: “As the candidates left the debate stage, the momentum Harris had generated after first replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee seemed to be cresting again. Her campaign manager announced she was ready for another debate with Trump, who himself plodded into the spin room in Philadelphia in an effort to shift the unfavorable post-debate narrative that saw even Fox News hosts declare Harris the winner.”

Number of the Week

2.3 million, the number of women of reproductive age in the U.S. who lack access to birthing facilities or obstetric doctors, according to a new report from infant health nonprofit March of Dimes.

Read more here.

MUST READS

Joe Biden speaks during the Violence Against Women Act 30th anniversary celebration at the White House.

Jose Luis Magana/AP

Biden marks the 30th anniversary of the passage of the landmark Violence Against Women Act,” by Colleen Long and Darlene Superville for The Associated Press: “As part of the 30th anniversary of the signing of the landmark Violence Against Women Act, the White House on Thursday is set to announce new efforts to address online harassment and abuse, and to help ease housing issues that many survivors of domestic violence face when they are trying to escape abusers.”

Sterilizations Among Women Rose After Roe Was Overturned, Study Finds” by Emily Schmall for The New York Times: “A new study published Wednesday found an increase in the use of tubal sterilization, in which women have their fallopian tubes tied or removed to permanently prevent pregnancy, in the six months after the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. The increase was most pronounced in states that effectively banned abortion, where sterilizations rose 39 percent by December 2022.”

2 Black women could make Senate history on Election Day,” by Lisa Mascaro for The Associated Press: “If the two Democratic candidates prevail in their elections this November, their arrival would double the number of Black women — from two to four — who have ever been elected to the Senate, whose 100 members have historically been, and continue to be, mostly white men.”

Quote of the Week

A quote from Vice President Kamala Harris during the Sept. 10 presidential debate with former President Donald Trump reads, The government, and Donald Trump, certainly should not be telling a woman what to do with her body.

Read more here.

on the move

Celia Glassman is now deputy director of policy and government affairs at AIPAC. She most recently was assistant director for legislative and regulatory policy at EY and has also worked for Sens. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.). (h/t National Security Daily)

Jessica Steffens is joining American Defense International as vice president of global affairs. She was most recently a senior professional staff member for the House Foreign Affairs Committee and was previously a policy adviser at the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs. (h/t POLITICO Influence)

Taylor Hittle is joining Washington Council EY’s health care practice. She previously was chief health staffer for the House Committee on Education and the Workforce Republicans and is a Markwayne Mullin, Michael Burgess, John Carter and Mimi Walters alum. (h/t POLITICO Influence)

 

Follow us on Twitter

Dana Nickel @delizanickel

Giselle Ruhiyyih Ewing @giselleruhiyyih

Katherine Long @katherinealong

Emma Cordover @Emma_Cordover

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post