How the Senate map explains Trump

Presented by PhRMA: Tomorrow’s conversation, tonight. Know where the news is going next.
Nov 11, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Newsletter Header

By Calder McHugh

Presented by 

PhRMA

Donald Trump smiles at a campaign event in September.

Donald Trump smiles at a campaign event in September. | Evan Vucci/AP

TURNAROUND — As Democrats continue to shift into recrimination mode about exactly what happened last Tuesday evening, they’ve found blame in lots of places — demographic shifts, inflation, concerns about immigration and even the wide world of podcasts.

But digging into the raw vote totals in the Senate and the presidential race suggests the problem may have been more about Kamala Harris — or perhaps more likely, her ties to the Biden administration — than the party itself.

In presidential election years, when voter turnout swells, presidential candidates often receive more votes than Senate candidates, even Senate incumbents. Yet this year, 11 of the 14 Senate Democratic incumbents up for reelection won more votes in their states than Harris.

By contrast, Donald Trump vastly outperformed Republican candidates for Senate, especially in swing states like Nevada and Michigan. Of the eight GOP incumbents up for reelection (not counting Nebraska Sen. Pete Ricketts, a former governor who was appointed in 2023), Trump had a higher vote total than six of them. The only senators he didn’t outpace were Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso and Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker, two veterans who are well known in their relatively small-population states.

Trump’s performance last week was a far cry from his first presidential bid in 2016. Back then, Republican candidates for Senate won in spite of him — of the 22 Republican Senate incumbents up for reelection that year, Trump ran ahead of only six of them. His great fortune was that Hillary Clinton was an even larger drag on her party’s ticket — all seven Democratic incumbents up for reelection that year won more votes than her in their home states.

This time around, he provided significant tailwinds, especially for the two Republican senators who had the closest reelection victories — Deb Fischer in Nebraska and Ted Cruz in Texas.

Trump’s transformation from drag on the Republican ticket to boon has Democrats unnerved about the future of their party. Where 2016 may have felt like a terrible nightmare powered by the strangeness of the Electoral College, 2024 felt like a total rebuke. Trump, who went from losing the popular vote by almost 3 million votes to winning it (by how many is yet unclear), can no longer be easily dismissed as an aberration governing without a popular mandate.

Ironically, though, in terms of the Senate, the outcome might be better for the Democratic Party moving forward. In 2016, zero states voted for a president of one party and a senator who came from another. This year, if Democrat Ruben Gallego’s lead holds, there are four — Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin.

All of that ticket splitting is due in large part to Trump’s strength relative to Harris; his popularity was in some cases not transferable to other Republicans on the ballot with him. He outran the Republican Senate candidates in those four states by huge margins, while Harris had trouble even matching the vote totals from Democratic Senate candidates.

As the dust settles on the 2024 election, Trump resembled a uniquely strong Republican candidate, while Harris ran more like a weak incumbent who voters wanted to punish. That might be a good sign for the future of the Democratic Party.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at cmchugh@politico.com or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @calder_mchugh.

 

A message from PhRMA:

Drug price “negotiations?” Higher costs and less access to medicines are not what seniors were promised when the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was signed into law. Learn more about the IRA’s unintended consequences.

 
What'd I Miss?

DOJ says Jack Smith’s delay in Trump case isn’t a reason to let defendants off the hook: Special counsel Jack Smith’s decision to pause his prosecution of President-elect Donald Trump is no reason to do the same for members of the mob that attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 , 2021, the Justice Department argued today. Several Jan. 6 defendants have used Smith’s call for a three-week breather — quickly endorsed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan — as proof that all criminal cases connected to the Jan. 6 attack deserve a similar slowdown.

— Biden admin to support controversial UN cybercrime convention: The United States will support the United Nations cybercrime convention when it comes up for a vote this week, top officials said Sunday night. The decision follows months of internal deliberations at the White House and other agencies over whether to support the treaty, which digital rights groups and other officials have raised serious concerns over due to its potential misuse by countries like Russia and China. A senior administration official, speaking anonymously as a condition of briefing reporters, said Sunday night ahead of an anticipated United Nations motion on the treaty today that the U.S. “decided to remain with consensus” and support the treaty moving forward.

Republicans inch closer to formally locking up House majority: There are more than a dozen House contests — and a Senate race — still uncalled by The Associated Press, but Republicans are inching ever closer to officially retaining the House majority, as western states continue to slowly tally up their ballots.

THE NEXT ADMINISTRATION

IT’S MILLER TIME — President-elect Donald Trump is set to install immigration hawks for two major White House roles, key positions that don’t require Senate confirmation and will enable them to enact his sweeping immigration agenda across the federal government.

Tom Homan, his pick for “border czar,” and Stephen Miller, his deputy White House chief of staff for policy, won’t formally helm any arms of government, but they are likely to carry enormous sway with cabinet secretaries and agency directors. They are expected to be viewed as the president’s direct emissaries, empowered to push for specific actions and track progress implementing Trump’s agenda.

SET ON EPA — President-elect Donald Trump today announced he has picked former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) to helm the Environmental Protection Agency, the first step in what Trump’s supporters have said could be a thorough shakeup of the regulatory body.

If confirmed, Zeldin would lead the Republican effort to roll back key climate change regulations enacted by the Biden administration, including rules tightening the pollution from power plants and tailpipes. His selection comes despite expectations that Trump would choose Andrew Wheeler, who served in the role during the previous Trump term.

NO RESISTANCE NECESSARY — A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers today that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

TRUMP’S ‘BORDER CZAR’ 2.0 — President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be “border czar” is ready to execute his boss’ immigration agenda come hell or high water. Thomas Homan, who oversaw Trump’s controversial family separation policy as acting ICE director, said the enforcement will be the “same as it was during the first administration” but Americans can expect “a hell of a lot more” deportations this time.

 

A message from PhRMA:

Advertisement Image

 
AROUND THE WORLD

A protestor holds up her hand that is covered with simulated oil during a demonstration.

A protestor holds up her hand that is covered with simulated oil during a demonstration in 2010 in Berkeley, California. | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

BIG PROBLEM — The United Kingdom wants to use this week’s COP29 climate summit to sell itself as a global environmental leader.

But it’s got a two-letter problem: BP. One of the U.K.’s largest companies, BP is a global force in fossil fuel drilling — and thick as thieves with COP29’s host Azerbaijan.

BP is Azerbaijan’s biggest foreign investor. There’s even a joke popular in the region that the Azerbaijani government sees two U.K. power bases in Baku: the British Embassy and BP’s office.

That three-way relationship means the U.K. oil and gas multinational’s influence — and the British government’s ties to it — will loom large over the U.K.’s participation in the key United Nations-organized climate summit in Baku this week.

“The U.K. government has turned a blind eye to this toxic relationship for too long,” said Louis Wilson, head of fossil fuel investigations at the NGO Global Witness. “BP’s presence in Azerbaijan is wrecking the U.K.’s COP29 climate goals, and undermining U.K. foreign policy interests too.”

CONCERNS FROM CHINA — China is worried about the upheaval Donald Trump might bring to the fight against climate change, Beijing’s top climate envoy Liu Zhenmin said today.

“The international situation has really changed — we’re also concerned about the United States after the election,” he said, speaking to reporters before a side event at the COP29 U.N. climate talks in Azerbaijan.

Trump has promised to yet again withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement on climate change, which almost 200 countries signed in 2015. The pact commits countries to a goal of keeping global warming ideally to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Nightly Number

Over $87,000

The price of bitcoin, the highest that the world’s largest cryptocurrency has ever climbed, after rising over 28 percent in the last week alone.

RADAR SWEEP

MONKEYS ON THE LOOSE — Just off the coast of Beaufort, South Carolina, 4,000 wild monkeys roam freely on the state’s Morgan Island, also known colloquially as “Monkey Island.” After 43 monkeys escaped from the Alpha Genesis research laboratory in Yemassee, whether the monkeys have a right to roam or are required to return to the lab has become a legal question. Long standing legal doctrines suggest that the monkeys on the loose may not belong to the company as long as they remain free and outside of its custody — but Alpha Genesis remains on the hunt for what it considers its property. For Vox, Angela Fernandez and Justin Marceau use historical examples to explore whether the monkeys fleeing confinement actually have a legal claim to freedom.

Parting Image

Air Force veteran John Dubiel salutes his fellow veterans at Arlington National Cemetery.

Air Force veteran John Dubiel salutes his fellow veterans at Arlington National Cemetery on Veterans Day in Washington today. | Angelina Katsanis/POLITICO

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Samantha Latson also contributed to today’s newsletter.

 

A message from PhRMA:

Seniors are feeling the true cost of drug price “negotiations.”

Instead of saving money, some Medicare patients will pay more for medicines.

Others may not be able to get their medicines – 89% of insurers and PBMs say they plan to reduce access to medicines in Medicare Part D because of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Higher costs and less access. That’s not what seniors were promised.

Learn more.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Charlie Mahtesian @PoliticoCharlie

Calder McHugh @calder_mchugh

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post