Just how special is this session?

Your afternoon must-read briefing on politics and government in the Golden State
Nov 14, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO California Playbook PM Newsletter Header

By Blake Jones and Lindsey Holden

Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference.

Gov. Gavin Newsom has called a special legislative session to prepare for California for the ramifications of Donald Trump's second administration. | Eric Thayer/AP

California’s Democratic leaders have eagerly reclaimed the mantle of anti-Trump resistance, which means no shortage of news for our growing team of journalists in Sacramento. Playbook PM will be your hub for scoops, analysis and behind-the-scenes details about the legislative special session and related developments in the state capital and beyond. Send your tips to Lindsey, our Playbook PM author, at lholden@politico.com

DUKES UP: Hello and welcome to Playbook PM, your news source for all things related to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s special session and California's moves to resist the second Donald Trump administration.

You’ve heard a lot about this special session by now, but you might be wondering what will actually be accomplished and when — or why it was called in the first place, when lawmakers are so close to starting their regular session.

Here’s what we know so far.

When does the special session happen?

It will officially begin Dec. 2, when the incoming class of legislators is sworn in. Lawmakers plan to gavel in, introduce budget legislation and leave until early January.

The Legislature will do the bulk of the work next year, including committee hearings and floor votes on the special session proposal.

What are Newsom and Democratic lawmakers planning to accomplish?

Democrats want to send millions of dollars to the California Department of Justice and other state agencies before Trump is inaugurated Jan. 20.

That money would be used to defend the state in court and sue the federal government — as then-Attorney General Xavier Becerra did more than 100 times during Trump’s first term in order to resist edicts on immigration, health care and the environment. Lawsuits this time around could push back against efforts to withhold federal funding from California.

How much will California spend?

State officials are still hashing that out.

Newsom spoke with Attorney General Rob Bonta the day before he announced the session about the need to fund Department of Justice efforts to shield California from an antagonistic federal government, Bonta told POLITICO last week.

The state gives the DOJ $2.5 million annually for litigation but appropriated three times as much during Trump’s first term.

This time around, the price tag could be as high as $100 million, according to one legislator granted anonymity to discuss private conversations.

The special session is happening at the same time as the regular session. Did Newsom really need to call this?

From a purely policymaking perspective, no.

“They don’t technically need the special session,” said veteran lobbyist Chris Micheli, an expert on legislative rules who teaches courses on state lawmaking at the McGeorge School of Law.

Appropriations like the one California is considering are typically approved through budget bills, which take effect immediately after they’re signed into law. There was nothing preventing legislators from returning to Sacramento in early January as planned and fast-tracking the funding proposal.

“I think the purpose is to draw particular attention to the fact that we are going to be one of the leaders — if not the leader — of the Trump resistance,” Micheli said.

POLITICO Pro subscribers can read more here.

IT’S THURSDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@politico.com.

 

The lame duck session could reshape major policies before year's end. Get Inside Congress delivered daily to follow the final sprint of dealmaking on defense funding, AI regulation and disaster aid. Subscribe now.

 
 
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY

Former President Donald Trump speaks on the phone wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat and a white polo shirt.

Gov. Gavin Newsom said on his podcast he's had a tough time getting in touch with president-elect Donald Trump. | Rebecca Blackwell/AP

CALL WAITING: Newsom seems to be having a hard time getting ahold of Trump, although he insists the president-elect isn’t spurning him.

During a discussion on the Wednesday episode of his “Politickin’” podcast, Newsom said he previously had a “shockingly good relationship” with Trump when he was governor during the last two years of the Republican’s previous term. This time around, it “feels different,” Newsom said.

Case in point, the governor said he reached out to Trump but “didn't connect with him.”

“Normally, we get right through,” Newsom said. “But it's a different time, man.”

Newsom’s co-host, former NFL star Marshawn Lynch, asked if that means the governor is “getting egged by the president.”

“Oh, he's not ignoring me, brother,” the governor said. “He's not ignoring me. He made sure loudly — I'm the ‘Newscum.’ I'm in all his stump speeches: ‘Newscum.’ That was literally seventh grade. I told you, that’s a golden oldie for me.”

“But no, we're hardly being ignored,” Newsom continued. “And you can't — look, here's the bottom line. You can't ignore California. You can't ignore — it's a tentpole.”

Trump campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt declined to discuss the situation, saying, “We don’t comment on the president’s personal conversations and calls.”

ON THE BEATS

State Senator Marie Alvarado-Gil, D-Jackson, listens to the discussion of a bill at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, July 10, 2023. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

State Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil filed a counter-complaint against a former staffer alleging he was involved in the disappearance of Washington, D.C. intern Chandra Levy. | AP

COUNTER SUIT: State Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil’s counter-complaint against the former staffer who sued her in September contains a bombshell allegation that he was involved in the unsolved disappearance and murder of Chandra Levy, our Dustin Gardiner reports.

Alvarado-Gil filed the suit against Chad Condit, who accused the state lawmaker of forcing him to perform sex acts and creating a hostile work environment. Condit is the son of former California Rep. Gary Condit, who had an affair with Levy — a Washington, D.C., intern — before she went missing in 2001 and was later found dead.

In an explosive accusation, Alvarado-Gil said Chad Condit told her he was “personally responsible for the unsolved disappearance and murder” of Levy.

Following those alleged comments, Alvarado-Gil "began to fear for her life and for her family's safety," according to her filing.

The younger Condit’s attorneys did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment today.

THIRST TRAP: Speaking of California leaders vying for Trump’s attention, Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher today released a letter he sent the president-elect to “extend my congratulations on your recent victory and to ask for your partnership in addressing the significant challenges facing California.”

He said the state needs help dealing with wildfires, housing, crime and energy and gas prices.

“While Governor Gavin Newsom wants to ‘Trump-proof’ California; Legislative Republicans want to partner with you to pursue real solutions,” Gallagher wrote. “We have been fighting tirelessly to fix California, but we need your support. Californians deserve real progress, not political showdowns that ultimately cost taxpayers and distract from the urgent needs of our state and nation.”

The tone of Gallagher’s letter suggests Republicans might be concerned their state could get caught in the crosshairs of a Trump vs. Newsom battle. If that’s the case, Gallagher could stand to benefit as California’s Trump-whisperer.

FOGGY FUTURE: San Francisco Rep. Nancy Pelosi ’s campaign filed paperwork for her to run for another term in 2026. But it’s unclear what the former speaker actually intends to do. Today, she brushed aside a question about her future from our colleague Nicholas Wu on Capitol Hill, responding, “And who are you?”

Pelosi’s future has long been a source of intrigue in her hometown. Her daughter, Christine Pelosi , an attorney and party organizer, is widely expected to run for the seat when her mother eventually retires. That would set the stage for a bruising and expensive intraparty fight with state Sen. Scott Wiener, who’s mounted a years-long shadow campaign to succeed the elder Pelosi.

But with Trump, Pelosi’s arch nemesis, returning to power, she might feel a duty to help Democrats resist the Republicans’ trifecta in Washington. When asked if he thought she would run again in 2026, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson said, “I hope so.”

Even if Pelosi does retire sooner rather than later, there’s a tactical advantage to keeping a 2026 committee open: She can continue to raise money — and keep the Scott Wieners of the world guessing about her plans. — Dustin Gardiner

TOOTH-HURTY: As POLITICO reported earlier today, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is shaping up to be the next secretary of Health and Human Services. Among his many controversial plans, he’s said he wants to remove fluoride from Americans’ drinking water.

Fluoride fun fact: Forty percent of Californians already drink non-fluoridated water, mostly from wells. Though that’s a significant decrease from the 1990s, when 83 percent of Californians were drinking water without fluoride, the state ranks 37th in getting it to all residents.

The California Dental Association has been sounding the alarm about fluoride and California’s high rates of tooth decay in children for years. Maybe we were just ahead of the trend.  — Rachel Bluth

 

Policy change is coming—be the pro who saw it first. Access POLITICO Pro’s Issue Analysis series on what the transition means for agriculture, defense, health care, tech, and more. Strengthen your strategy.

 
 
WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY

— Assemblymember Matt Haney dropped thousands of dollars in campaign cash on lavish hotels — including a two-night stay in a castle — during a July trip to Ireland. (San Francisco Standard)

— Elon Musk’s new government efficiency department is seeking volunteers for “tedious” work with no compensation. (POLITICO)

— Why some Ventura County homes survived the Mountain Fire while others burned. (Los Angeles Times)

AROUND THE STATE

— Top California pension executives are getting million-dollar pay bonuses after the state’s two biggest public retirement funds beat their earnings targets last year. (CalMatters)

— Housing advocates in Los Angeles worry a rezoning plan intended to boost housing supply could cause more tenant displacement. (Los Angeles Times)

— What does Trump’s second term mean for Tijuana and San Diego’s cross-border economy? (San Diego Union-Tribune)

— compiled by Tyler Katzenberger

 

Subscribe to the POLITICO Playbook family

Playbook  |  Playbook PM  |  California Playbook  |  Florida Playbook  |  Illinois Playbook  |  Massachusetts Playbook  |  New Jersey Playbook  |  New York Playbook  |  Ottawa Playbook  |  Brussels Playbook  |  London Playbook

View all our political and policy newsletters

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post