Government’s role in health care AI is on the ballot. Former President Donald Trump has a laissez-faire approach. Vice President Kamala Harris promises more guardrails. Whoever wins will decide how — or more likely whether — artificial intelligence is regulated in health care. Why it matters: Harris has helped shape White House AI policies, meeting with health care industry and civil rights groups to discuss the technology’s potential risks and benefits. A year ago, President Joe Biden issued a sweeping executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services to convene a task force to evaluate AI’s potential harms and develop a strategy to mitigate them. Now, HHS is close to announcing a new leadership team to manage data, AI and technology policy writ large. The agency plans to unveil a regulatory plan by January. A Trump presidency could change all that. Publicly, Trump has pushed deregulation as a primary objective. Even if his administration kept some HHS initiatives, it would likely slow down or scrap further rulemaking. Some in the health care industry want AI rules to ensure the tools improve patient outcomes and are safe, which could reassure reluctant AI adopters and, as a result, speed the technology’s rollout. However, there’s no consensus in Congress on how to proceed, effectively leaving the issue to the executive branch. Even so: The Biden administration has favored a hands-off approach to help AI develop quickly and let American tech firms compete with China. Wild card: AI skeptic and Trump backer Elon Musk is likely to have Trump's ear if Trump wins. The billionaire Tesla CEO has supported AI regulations including a California bill that would have required safety testing for large-scale AI models if Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom hadn't vetoed it in September. If Trump makes it to the White House, Musk could advise him to take a more cautious approach on the technology.
|