Health care package winners and losers

Presented by the Coalition to Strengthen America’s Healthcare: Delivered daily by 10 a.m., Pulse examines the latest news in health care politics and policy.
Dec 18, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Pulse Newsletter Header

By Chelsea Cirruzzo and Ben Leonard

Presented by the Coalition to Strengthen America’s Healthcare

With Carmen Paun

Driving The Day

Clouds pass over the U.S. Capitol

Congress released the text of a bill — including a healh care package — that would fund the government through March. | Joshua Roberts/Getty Images

TAKEAWAYS FROM THE HEALTH CARE DEAL — Pharmacy benefit managers may soon have to comply with new regulations under an agreement from Congress, Ben reports.

Congressional leaders released bill text Tuesday night that would fund the federal government into March, including a health care package that contains a significant overhaul of PBM business practices.

The package comes after much back and forth over the scope of the deal between Republicans and Democrats. The deal, expected to be signed into law, signals that lawmakers wanted to wrap up this Congress’ business and largely clear the decks for President-elect Donald Trump’s agenda. It could get pushback from conservatives, who have said the stopgap measure addresses too many issues not directly related to government funding.

Here are the winners and losers.

Winners: 

The pharmaceutical industry: The pharmaceutical company has spent years and tens of millions of dollars targeting PBMs — companies that negotiate drug prices on behalf of insurers and employers — after they were dealt a blow by the Inflation Reduction Act, which allowed Medicare to negotiate drug prices for the first time. PBMs are set to face significant new regulations, such as delinking the reimbursement PBMs get in Medicare from the list price of drugs and cracking down on so-called spread pricing in Medicaid.

Still, the package contains changes to the drug patent system to address “patent thickets,” overlapping patents that critics have said stifle competition, similar to ones the industry has opposed.

Telehealth advocates: Lawmakers agreed to two key healthcare extensions: Eased rules for telehealth services will continue for two more years under Medicare, and some commercial insurers and Medicare patients can receive hospital care in their homes for five more years.

Addiction treatment advocates: Lawmakers are poised to extend for five years the opioid-fighting SUPPORT Act, which expired more than a year ago. The legislation authorizes programs and funding to help curb opioid addiction.

Losers: 

PBMs: Pharmacy benefit managers have cast the proposed changes as ones that would substantially hurt their ability to negotiate lower drug prices.

“If the massive Big Pharma giveaway spending bill passes, big drug companies will get billions in windfall profits, and seniors will face further disruption to their drug plans and may lose Medicare Part D coverage as they know it — certainly, seniors will be forced to pay much higher premiums,” the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, a PBM lobby, said in a statement. “The bill also represents a precedent-setting government intrusion into commercial market contracting.”

Doctors: After debate, lawmakers didn’t add new rules for prior authorization in Medicare Advantage.

Prior authorization, insurers’ practice of requiring providers to get their approval before beginning treatment, is a top complaint of doctors and patients.

The proposal also includes a 2.5 percent payment boost for doctors in Medicare, but not enough to offset a 2.83 percent cut CMS finalized in November. It would also have a 3.53 percent bonus for alternative payment models. Still, the changes aren’t the longer-term solution doctors have been pushing for.

Backers of Chinese biotech crackdown: The BIOSECURE Act, which would curtail Chinese biotechnology companies’ ability to do business in the U.S., wasn’t included in the legislation. Supporters had warned that Beijing could use some named firms in the act to obtain sensitive information like Americans’ genomic data due to China’s intelligence laws regarding private business.

WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. Spotted up on Capitol Hill on Tuesday: Santa hats, a gingerbread Capitol and my desperate search for a fun, warm seasonal drink. Any favorite coffee spots on the Hill? I’d love a peppermint mocha. Let me know and send your tips, scoops and feedback to ccirruzzo@politico.com and bleonard@politico.com and follow along @ChelseaCirruzzo and @_BenLeonard_.

 

A message from the Coalition to Strengthen America’s Healthcare:

NEW REPORT: More than 60% of all Emergency Department visits occur after regular business hours or on weekends when other providers and care facilities are typically closed. Hospitals and health systems are indispensable, crucial access points for critical care 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. ACCESS THE REPORT.

 
In Congress

Jon Tester speaks to reporters in Capitol.

Sen. Jon Tester and other leaders of the Senate and House Veterans' Affairs committees have signed off on a bipartisan bill that would expand caregiving services for veterans. | Angelina Katsanis/POLITICO

VETS BILL TO BIDEN — The House passed legislation this week to boost caregiving for veterans with backing from House and Senate veterans’ leaders, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk, where he’s expected to sign it into law, Ben reports.

The bipartisan legislation from Veterans’ Affairs Committee leaders in both chambers — Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Rep. Mike Bost (R-Ill.) with support from Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) — would expand veterans’ access to home and community-based services.

It would raise the maximum VA payment for home care programs from 65 percent of nursing home costs to 100 percent.

“We worked hard to craft this legislation to put veterans — not government bureaucracy — at the core of it,” Bost said in a statement. “The Dole Act will do that by expanding economic opportunities, simplifying the disability claims process, reforming services for aging veterans, opening more doors for mental health support, and a lot more.”

A previous version had included a hard deadline for the VA and contractor Oracle Cerner to hit quality metrics for the agency’s beleaguered project to modernize its electronic health record system or terminate the contract, but that was stripped from the legislation.

 

You read POLITICO for trusted reporting. Now follow every twist of the lame duck session with Inside Congress. We track the committee meetings, hallway conversations, and leadership signals that show where crucial year-end deals are heading. Subscribe now.

 
 


FIRST IN PULSE: LEE PASSES THE BATON ON HIV — After more than two decades in Congress, outgoing Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) is passing the torch of the global fight against HIV to fellow Democrat Robin Kelly of Illinois, Carmen reports.

Kelly will lead the fight to reauthorize a massive U.S. global HIV/AIDS program in the next Congress, Lee’s office announced Tuesday in a statement first shared with POLITICO.

Lee, the co-chair and co-founder of the Congressional HIV/AIDS Caucus, reintroduced legislation Wednesday to reauthorize the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, better known as PEPFAR, for another five years.

The program, credited with saving more than 25 million lives since its creation in 2003, is due to expire in March after Congress reauthorized for only one year last year instead of the usual five — for the first time in PEPFAR’s history — over some Republicans’ concerns that it was indirectly funding abortion abroad.

Why it matters: PEPFAR’s lack of a long-term reauthorization, coupled with Lee’s departure, has triggered concerns from global health activists that the U.S. commitment to the global fight against HIV/AIDS is dwindling amid bitter U.S. political partisanship.

 

A message from the Coalition to Strengthen America’s Healthcare:

Advertisement Image

 
PHARMA WATCH

HHS HIT WITH ANOTHER LAWSUIT — Sanofi is the latest drugmaker to sue HHS over its rejection of a plan to charge certain hospitals full price for drugs the company had previously sold at a discount under the 340B program.

The lawsuit, filed Monday and similar to those filed by Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly, challenges how the program, which provides hospitals that serve low-income patients steep discounts on drugs, is paid for by hospitals.

How we got here: The drugmakers have said they want to initially charge full price for the discounts and then offer reimbursement via rebates or credits later. But both J&J and Sanofi, which were about to implement plans to do so, have backed down after the Health Resources and Services Administration warned that such moves would run afoul of the law if the HHS secretary didn’t agree to the plan. HRSA threatened sanctions if Sanofi went ahead anyway.

HRSA directed Pulse to the letter it sent Sanofi on December 13, warning against its plan.

“If Sanofi implements its credit proposal without Secretarial approval, it will violate Section 340B(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA),” HRSA said, adding that Sanofi would be nixed from the program if it continues.

A Sanofi spokesperson said in a statement it’s confident the proposed model is legal, and HRSA has “no authority” to reject it.

The spokesperson added that HRSA’s threat of sanctions is “excessively punitive” and jeopardizes “access to Sanofi’s lifesaving medicines for millions of Medicare and Medicaid patients.”

America’s Essential Hospitals, a trade group representing so-called safety-net hospitals, praised HRSA and called on Sanofi and other drug manufacturers “to abandon their harmful policies that stand between patients and affordable health care and choose people over profits.”

 

POLITICO Pro's unique analysis combines exclusive transition intelligence and data visualization to help you understand not just what's changing, but why it matters for your organization. Explore how POLITICO Pro will make a difference for you.

 
 
WHAT WE'RE READING

Science reports that an infamous paper popularizing an unproven Covid-19 treatment has been retracted.

The Washington Post reports that the suspect in the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting has been indicted on first-degree murder charges.

POLITICO’s Ruth Reader reports on a congressional report on AI that calls for enhanced FDA oversight capability.

 

A message from the Coalition to Strengthen America’s Healthcare:

NEW REPORT: In 2021 alone, Americans visited Emergency Departments more than 83 million times after hours or on weekends when other providers and care facilities are typically closed. With more than 60% of ED visits occurring on weekends or after regular business hours, when many other providers are closed, hospitals play an essential role in their communities, providing crucial access points for care 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year to all patients.

ACCESS THE REPORT.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Dan Goldberg @dancgoldberg

Chelsea Cirruzzo @chelseacirruzzo

Lauren Gardner @Gardner_LM

Sophie Gardner @sophie_gardnerj

Kelly Hooper @kelhoops

Robert King @rking_19

Ben Leonard @_BenLeonard_

David Lim @davidalim

Megan Messerly @meganmesserly

Alice Miranda Ollstein @aliceollstein

Carmen Paun @carmenpaun

Daniel Payne @_daniel_payne

Ruth Reader @RuthReader

Erin Schumaker @erinlschumaker

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post