The CFPB’s next funding fight

Presented by U.S. Bank: Delivered daily by 8 a.m., Morning Money examines the latest news in finance politics and policy.
Jun 11, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Morning Money

By Katy O'Donnell

Presented by 

U.S. Bank

Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.

QUICK FIX

Just when they thought they were home free — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Rohit Chopra will face Congress this week as the head of a newly emboldened bureau: The CFPB is vastly expanding its enforcement staff and gearing up to take on bank fees, credit reporting and open banking after the Supreme Court upheld its funding.

But Republicans aren’t giving up the fight against an agency they have been trying to eviscerate since its inception – including by throwing up yet another challenge to the validity of the agency’s funding.

Under the 2010 Dodd-Frank law that created the bureau, the CFPB is supposed to draw its budget from the Federal Reserve’s “earnings,” a mechanism put in place by Democrats to insulate the agency from political pressure. Yet critics, including retired Harvard Law School professor Hal Scott, argue that the Fed — which stopped transferring money to the Treasury in September 2022 — doesn't have earnings right now.

“The novel funding mechanism remains an important legal question,Rep. Andy Barr said in an interview. “And the fact that the Federal Reserve has been operating at a loss for several years raises the important statutory and constitutional question of whether, at least since then, the CFPB has been funded in accordance with the law.”

Barr, a member of the House Financial Services Committee who is running to be its next chair, said he expects lawmakers to bring up the funding issue when Chopra appears before the panel on Thursday, a day after he testifies before Senate Banking. Barr has introduced a bill to place the bureau under congressional appropriations.

The argument is a serious one, according to Alan Kaplinsky, former chair of the consumer financial services group at Ballard Spahr: “I think it has a lot of merit — I’m absolutely convinced, and I wish I had thought of the idea,” he said. “I’m quite sure it will get raised at some point in court.”

Kaplinsky said the argument stands a better chance of succeeding than the one that the Supreme Court rejected last month when it protected the CFPB’s funding mechanism. In that case, payday lenders had charged that the bureau’s funding is unconstitutional because it is not subject to congressional appropriations.

“Unlike the other funding argument, which required a lot of constitutional research…this argument relies on one word, and that is, what are ‘earnings’ of the Federal Reserve system?” Kaplinsky said. “And the plain meaning of the word ‘earnings,’ if you look it up in any dictionary, it’s your revenue less your expenses.”

Not so fast, says Jeff Sovern, a consumer law professor at the University of Maryland school of law, who argues that earnings could also mean total income, not net profits. “When we’re speaking of individuals, we say their earnings are X, and X is their salary — we don’t deduct for expenses of getting to their job,” Sovern said.

What’s more, the Dodd-Frank law does not stipulate that the earnings have to come from the same year in which the consumer bureau is paid, he said: “Since they speak about the specific fiscal year when they’re talking about the cap on what the bureau can get, it’s clear that they could have referred to that specific year in the first clause of the statute, but they chose not to.”

Still, it’s another challenge to the bureau that could work its way through the courts.

“Is life now a bed of roses for the CFPB — have they survived the last challenge? I don’t think so,” said Bryan Schneider, former associate director for supervision, enforcement and fair lending at the bureau. “There will remain significant challenges to potentially everything they do.”

A message from U.S. Bank:

At U.S. Bank, we believe everyone deserves financial freedom. That’s why we provided 1.5 million people with financial education in 2023. Through partnerships like our program with the University of St. Thomas, we’re empowering young people with tools to lay the foundation for long-term financial wellness. Because U.S. Bank is small enough to care, and big enough to make a difference. Learn more.

 

GOP lawmakers have a lot of other contentious issues to raise with Chopra at the hearings. Among other topics, they’re planning to press him on the agency’s use of policy guidance rather than formal notice-and-comment rulemaking to advance its agenda on some issues.

Sen. Tim Scott, the top Republican on the banking committee, and his colleagues “will highlight how the CFPB routinely acts outside its scope of authority — regulating through blog posts, press releases, and enforcement actions under the guise of ‘clarifying guidance,’” said Ryann DuRant, senior communications adviser to Scott.

The CFPB declined to comment.

IT’S TUESDAY — Thanks for reading Morning Money. Hit me up on all things CFPB at kodonnell@politico.com or @KatyODonnell_. And as always, reach out to Sam for tips and suggestions at ssutton@politico.com or @samjsutton.

 

THE GOLD STANDARD OF FINANCIAL SERVICES POLICY REPORTING & INTELLIGENCE: POLITICO has more than 500 journalists delivering unrivaled reporting and illuminating the policy and regulatory landscape for those who need to know what’s next. Throughout the election and the legislative and regulatory pushes that will follow, POLITICO Pro is indispensable to those who need to make informed decisions fast. The Pro platform dives deeper into critical and quickly evolving sectors and industries, like financial services, equipping policymakers and those who shape legislation and regulation with essential news and intelligence from the world’s best politics and policy journalists.

Our newsroom is deeper, more experienced, and better sourced than any other. Our financial services reporting team—including Zach Warmbrodt, Victoria Guida and Declan Harty—is embedded with the market-moving legislative committees and agencies in Washington and across states, delivering unparalleled coverage of financial policy and the financial services industry. We bring subscribers inside the conversations that determine policy outcomes and the future of industries, providing insight that cannot be found anywhere else. Get the premier news and policy intelligence service, SUBSCRIBE TO POLITICO PRO TODAY.

 
 
Driving the day

The NFIB optimism survey will be released at 6 a.m. … The Peterson Institute for International Economics will hold an event on China’s venture capital sector at 9 a.m. …

White House eyes Goldsmith Romero for FDIC — CFTC Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero is the leading candidate to become the next chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., a person familiar with the deliberations told our Declan Harty.

Three weeks after the White House vowed to quickly name a successor to embattled FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg, Goldsmith Romero could be named to lead the banking regulator “very soon,” said the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss the still-private conversations. No formal decision has been made, they added. The Wall Street Journal earlier reported the news.

Goldsmith Romero, if ultimately nominated and confirmed, would take over the FDIC as the banking regulator deals with the fallout of a string of reports detailing a toxic workplace culture. The CFTC commissioner’s record at the derivatives regulator and Treasury Department as well as her management experience have made her the “leading contender” for the job, the person said. Goldsmith Romero has been twice confirmed by the Senate.

Get ready for a wild week — Markets absorb the consumer price index for May and the Federal Reserve’s decision on monetary policy on Wednesday. The stock market could see big swings between the two announcements, reports Jess Menton for Bloomberg.

Very MetaA fight over Meta’s disclosure of risks to its investors has made its way to the Supreme Court, Declan Harty reports. A lawsuit led by Amalgamated Bank — a key financial services provider for Democratic campaign committees and Super PACs — claimed that the social media company misled investors about the risk of improper access to its customers’ information years after that data was misused by Cambridge Analytica. Meta’s appeal has been backed by the Chamber of Commerce and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

More on the billionaires — Bloomberg Opinion Editor Robert Burgess unpacks some of the arguments the GOP’s billionaire class has made for why former President Donald Trump deserves a second term. When one unpacks the economic data from his term, “it’s not evident that the economy benefited or that financial markets rewarded the Trump administration” for policies that slashed regulations and lowered taxes, he writes.

BlackRock to offer investors new anti-DEI voting policy Our Declan Harty reports: “BlackRock is expanding the menu of available policies that investors can pick from when determining how they want to weigh in on corporate and shareholder proposals — this time, with an anti-diversity, equity and inclusion option.

“The world's largest asset manager plans to begin offering institutional investors two new proxy voting policies in July under its Voting Choice program, BlackRock said Tuesday, raising the number of options to 16. Built by Egan-Jones, a proxy advisory firm, the new options include a "Wealth-Focused Policy" that would oppose proposals aimed at promoting DEI or protecting the environment by curbing greenhouse gas emissions. The other new addition is intended to strike a balance between Egan-Jones's ESG policy and its Wealth-Focused one.”

 

A message from U.S. Bank:

Advertisement Image

 
The Economy

Flood watch A report released Monday by Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee estimates that flooding could erase between $180 billion and $496 billion per year from U.S. growth domestic product, Eleanor Mueller reports. That includes as much as $15 billion in damages to homes with federally backed mortgages, which are largely insured through the National Flood Insurance Program.

Adios offices, hello diners — Food services businesses accounted for 19 percent of all retail leases last year — the highest percentage since before the global financial crisis. The increase reflects how Americans are spending more time and money at restaurants, writes The Wall Street Journal’s Kate King.

 

JOIN US ON 6/13 FOR A TALK ON THE FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE: As Congress and the White House work to strengthen health care affordability and access, innovative technologies and treatments are increasingly important for patient health and lower costs. What barriers are appearing as new tech emerges? Is the Medicare payment process keeping up with new technologies and procedures? Join us on June 13 as POLITICO convenes a panel of lawmakers, officials and experts to discuss what policy solutions could expand access to innovative therapies and tech. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
Regulatory Corner

Let’s try this again The SEC requested additional disclosures from New York Community Bank’s proxy statement, including the reasons why it raised $1.05 billion of capital from a consortium of investors that included former U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, according to Reuters.

New sanctionsThe Treasury Department sanctioned 10 people, entities and vessels for making illegal shipments involving Iranian-backed Houthis, Chris Marquette reports.

A message from U.S. Bank:

At U.S. Bank, we see the value in community.

That’s why we invest in programs around the country that make our communities stronger. In 2023, we provided 1.5 million people with financial education and committed $555 million to Community Development Financial Institutions in support of small business and home ownership.

We’re also proud to invest in veterans housing nationwide. Since 2013, U.S. Bancorp Impact Finance has supported housing for veterans – totaling over 3,600 units, $575 million in equity and $588 million in debt commitments in investments. We believe everyone deserves a place to call home, and by investing in nonprofits like St. Michael’s Veterans Center, we’re creating communities for those who’ve served.

U.S. Bank. Small enough to care, and big enough to make a difference.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Mark McQuillan @mcqdc

Zachary Warmbrodt @Zachary

Victoria Guida @vtg2

Declan Harty @ @declanharty

Eleanor Mueller @eleanor_mueller

Katy O'Donnell @katyodonnell_

Sam Sutton @samjsutton

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post