Why markets don’t care about political upheaval

Delivered daily by 8 a.m., Morning Money examines the latest news in finance politics and policy.
Jul 19, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Morning Money

By Sam Sutton

Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.

QUICK FIX

The events of the last three weeks unleashed a tornado that could change Washington forever and upend political orthodoxies that have shaped economic policy for decades.

Investors hate uncertainty. But even as questions swirl around President Joe Biden’s viability atop the Democratic ticket — and despite any fear of the possible damage that former President Donald Trump’s tariff and immigration policies could do to the U.S. economy — markets show no indication of concern. Even the shooting at Trump's rally last weekend had little bearing.

In the past, those events “would have sent shockwaves” through Wall Street, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a professor of management at the Yale School of Management who regularly consults with top U.S. CEOs, told MM.

That hasn’t happened. Dealmakers are bullish that merger activity will accelerate soon — particularly with Federal Reserve interest rate cuts likely coming in September. Inflation is easing. The labor market is healthy, but softening. The consensus among big bank executives and analysts is that the economy is slowing down but sound, according to this week’s earnings calls.

“This is an anomalous time,” Sonnenfeld said.

To steal a phrase from Donald Rumsfeld, the uncertainty that sent Washington into convulsions is largely composed of “known unknowns” for investors. Scott Wren, a senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, warned clients this week that it would be a “bad idea to make meaningful portfolio adjustments based on who you think is going to win the upcoming election.”

Polls aren’t always a reliable indicator, Wren wrote. Policy priorities can shift depending on congressional leadership and intraparty conflicts. The state of the economy offers a “clearer signal for an investor than trying to predict the eventual market impact of any election.”

(That doesn’t mean investors won’t react to political news. The Nasdaq dipped on Thursday after semiconductor stocks fell on reports that Biden was weighing new trade restrictions and Trump’s commentary on the defense of Taiwan, The WSJ’s Dan Gallagher reported. The broader market selloff was largely attributed to investors pivoting away from larger cap stocks.)

That markets haven’t responded more aggressively to political turmoil could be interpreted as a sign of optimism that U.S. institutions are secure enough to withstand whatever tumult is inflicted by political leadership, said Alec Phillips, the chief U.S. political economist at Goldman Sachs.

If investors thought the differences between a second Trump or Biden administration — or another Democratic alternative — were substantial enough to affect the rule of law, “markets might move when [election] probabilities change,” Phillips told MM.

“Everyone wants to talk about what different outcomes mean,” he added. “But the whole point is we don’t really know.”

JPMorgan Chase CFO Jeremy Barnum said during a media call last week that the current environment is “no different” than any other, and that while “everyone’s talking about it … I don’t think that’s financially material in the context of earnings.”

Of course, there’s a possibility that the market’s limited reaction is naive. Perhaps it discounts the tail risks of institutions like the Fed or Supreme Court becoming politicized. Geopolitical hotspots could be further inflamed. Unfavorable policy shifts could occur if the electorate grows more pessimistic about the country’s future.

If those are risks, they aren’t certain or immediate. Speculating about their specific effects on markets may be a futile exercise.

Consider this: In 2016, the consensus view was that Hillary Clinton would win. If Trump was somehow victorious, there was a belief that the stock market would tank. Trump won and markets soared.

At the time, “the response of most forecasters was to tweak their models and promise to do better next time,” Oaktree Capital Management Co-Chair Howard Marks wrote earlier this week. “Mine was to say, ‘if that’s not enough to convince you that (a) we don’t know what’s going to happen and (b) we don’t know how the markets will react to what actually does happen, I don’t know what is.’”

IT’S FRIDAY — Here’s hoping this weekend is quieter and much more peaceful. Send tips and suggestions to ssutton@politico.com and @samjsutton.

 

The CNN-POLITICO Grill has quickly become a key gathering place for policymakers and thought-leaders attending the RNC in Milwaukee.

On Tuesday, POLITICO and Bayer convened two conversations: a discussion with Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) and Rep. G.T. Thompson (R-Pa.) and an executive conversation with Bayer’s Jessica Christiansen, senior vice president and head of crop science and sustainability communications.

The conversations focused on the news of the day in Milwaukee, including deeper discussion centered on the critical challenges faced by the agriculture sector.

CATCH UP HERE

 
 
Driving the Day

New York Fed President John Williams will participate in a panel at a conference organized by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Reinventing Bretton Woods Committee and Inter-American Development Bank at 10:40 a.m.

Regulators weigh megamerger — The fight over Capital One’s plan to take over Discover heats up today as the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency hold a public hearing on whether to greenlight the $35 billion deal, Michael Stratford reports. The banks’ CEOs and proponents of the merger will make their case at the virtual convening alongside critics of the deal, including dozens of community groups and Rep. Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee.

Trump’s big night — Trump accepted the Republican nomination on Thursday night. He opened his speech with a powerful and somber reflection of last week’s shooting. Then, he riffed. There were references to Weimar inflation, Hannibal Lecter, Wrestlemania III and his friendly relationship with Kim Jong Un. There were calls for unity and claims that he was cheated out of the 2020 election.

He also said he would lower inflation, pay off debt, slash taxes and leverage America’s energy resources to bring down costs for consumers. He claimed that inflation has led to “despair and depression. We cannot and will not let this continue.”

Hello darkness my old friend The Biden campaign is insisting that the president intends to stay atop the Democratic ticket. Still, “there was growing hope that the president is rapidly being pushed toward a decision point,” Adam Cancryn, Jonathan Lemire and Eli Stokols report.

— Axios reports that top Democrats believe that Biden could decide to drop out of the race as soon as this weekend. The Associated Press reports that former President Barack Obama and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have also gotten more vocal about their concerns. Sen. Jon Tester, a Montana Democrat facing a tough reelection battle, became the second Senate Democrat to call for Biden to step aside, Jordain Carney and Ursula Perano report.

Bidenomics — In Wisconsin, Biden’s economic policies haven’t been enough to stop the bleeding for his reelection bid, Gavin Bade and Meredith Lee Hill report.

— More uncertainty around student loans: An appeals court on Thursday temporarily blocked the administration's new student loan repayment plan, Rebecca Carballo reports.

On the Hill

Barr, Hill lead Q2 cash dash — Jasper Goodman reports that Reps. Andy Barr and French Hill are outraising their competitors in the race to become the next top Republican on the House Financial Services Committee.

Barr, a Kentucky Republican who currently leads the panel’s Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy subcommittee, raked in around $954,662 across his campaign committee and leadership PAC in the second quarter of 2024 — the most of any candidate in the GOP gavel race. Hill, who’s running for re-election in Arkansas, raised a combined $873,750 for his campaign and leadership PAC.

Reps. Frank Lucas of Oklahoma and Bill Huizenga of Michigan, who are also running to succeed Rep. Patrick McHenry as the top Republican on the panel, both brought in smaller hauls. Lucas raised about $643,300 across his campaign and leadership PAC — up more than 300 percent from his sum last quarter — while Huizenga raised around $630,523.

Crypto vote The House next week is planning to vote on a cryptocurrency crime bill sponsored by Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) that would create an interagency working group to tackle illicit finance in crypto, Eleanor reports.

Elections

How CEOs are thinking about JD VanceTrump’s selection of the Ohio senator as his number two on the GOP ticket has some CEOs spooked.

“Republican business people are concerned with the populist angle that Vance has taken to economic issues,” Kathy Wylde, the president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, a nonprofit organization that represents the city’s top business leaders, told MM. “If that is the future of the Republican Party, it is a departure from traditional orthodoxy that the so-called establishment is not going to embrace.”

Of course, many of those same Republicans have embraced Trump. And while there are grumbles that Vance might hurt the party’s appeal to moderates — or those who adhere to a more traditional Republican economic playbook — that does not mean it will translate into meaningful attrition. It’s helped the party expand its network of support in among venture capitalists and tech leaders, and existing large donors are bullish on the ticket’s chances.

“It may set him back with the financial class of the party,” Ken Spain, a longtime GOP strategist and the head of Narrative Strategies, said. “But if he’s looking to pick up 20,000 to 30,000 votes in states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania? That’s the calculus.”

 

Understand 2024’s big impacts with Pro’s extensive Campaign Races Dashboard, exclusive insights, and key coverage of federal- and state-level debates. Focus on policy. Learn more.

 
 
The Economy

A historic percentage of Americans paid their credit card bills on time at the height of the pandemic. But delinquency rates on card payments have been climbing steadily since late 2021, and are now at a level where it’s caught the attention of Fed policymakers.

“What you're seeing with delinquencies is very similar to what you're seeing in the labor market,” Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee told your MM host. It suggests the economy is slowing down, particularly for low-income borrowers with weaker credit. But it’s not necessarily indicative of a problem — at least not yet.

“It’s kind of like the unemployment rate. It’s up a fair amount, you know, more than half a point,” Goolsbee said. But the U.S.’s current 4.1 percent unemployment rate is still low enough that “not very long ago, they would have called it full employment.”

If delinquency rates stabilize at this “normal level, you wouldn't be as nervous, but you should be attuned to it,” he said.

 

Follow us on Twitter

Mark McQuillan @mcqdc

Zachary Warmbrodt @Zachary

Victoria Guida @vtg2

Declan Harty @ @declanharty

Eleanor Mueller @eleanor_mueller

Katy O'Donnell @katyodonnell_

Sam Sutton @samjsutton

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to salenamartine360.news1@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post